Local Resources, Local Needs, and Questions of Scale: Linkages Between
Housing, Forestry, and Community Development in
The Idea in a Nutshell
Several observations led to this project. (1) The majority of forestland owners in
There ought to be a way to put these pieces
together. We believe this can best be
accomplished through the combined efforts of university, USDA Forest Service,
and local partners in
Background and
Consultation
During Spring
2003, Conner Bailey and Mark Dubois put forward a proposal to the Alabama
Agricultural Experiment Station as part of the AAES’ competitive Foundation
Grants program. The proposal (“Local
Resources, Local Needs …”) was designed to examine potential linkages between
local natural resources, local needs for improved housing, and the design
talents of the Rural Studio. We
discussed project objectives with the faculty involved in the Rural Studio,
with Lukata Mujumbe of the
Federation of Southern Cooperatives, with Jim Kellen
of the Hale Empowerment and Revitalization Organization (HERO), and with
various professionals within the USDA Forest Service from whom we may request
technical assistance.
We were notified that our proposal
was successful in late Spring 2003 and we proceeded to
recruit Beau Brodbeck and Pat Kennealy
as graduate students to work with us starting in the Fall. Beau and Pat made one visit to
Project
Objectives and Resources
Our successful proposal was written
in response to a “request for proposals” prepared by the AAES. Our proposed project has three objectives,
reflecting the research orientation of the AAES:
1. Conduct a historical accounting of the effects of labor-capital
substitution on forest management and the evolution of timber harvesting;
2. Assess housing needs and conditions in the study area;
3. Identify opportunities for small-scale forest management,
harvesting, and production techniques, and their potential to serve local needs
for employment, building materials, and the development of micro-enterprises.
We
were successful in obtaining $40,000 for the first year of our project with the
possibility of extension for an additional two years at the same level of
support. Funding from this grant is
earmarked primarily for graduate student stipends and thesis research. No faculty or other professional salaries are
involved. In addition to Bailey and
Dubois, there are several other professionals who will contribute to our
project. These include Dr. Valentina Hartarska (an economist
with expertise in micro-enterprise development), Dr. Bob Rummer
(an expert on logging systems), and Dr. Ken Muehlenfeld
(whose work focuses on helping companies locate in areas where timber resources
are available.
The AAES will review progress on an
annual basis (June 2004 is the one year anniversary) and determine whether to
continue funding. They will look for
research productivity and evidence of having sought additional funding. Indeed, AAES funding is viewed as “seed”
money with the expectation that we will be successful in obtaining external
funds. Where we look will in part be
determined by how the project develops and what the various stakeholders want
to achieve together.
Justification
Owners of smaller holdings
interested in selective logging have been left with few if any options for
harvesting and marketing their timber.
There is a pressing need to better address the harvesting and silvicultural needs of smaller forest ownership units (DeCoster 1998; Greene et al. 1997). Newly engineered small-scale harvesting
technologies are being tested in
There is no expectation that our
efforts will lead to the demise of industrial-scale forestry and the important
role this sector plays in
The AAES Foundation Grant Program
will provide the catalyst for bringing together a group of actors who have been
engaged in discussions surrounding this proposal for well over a year. This research proposal is designed to
generate publishable results, ideas and effective partnerships which will lead
to successful applications for external funds, and lead to practical rural
development initiatives linking natural resource and economic opportunity for
workers and landowners. Dr. Valentina Hartarska is an
agricultural economist with expertise in small enterprise development. Our collaborators from the USDA Forest
Service will provide valuable guidance on technological choices and, in the
future, training and financial assistance should this be appropriate. Our partners with the Rural Studio and the
Hale Empowerment and Revitalization Organization will provide valuable input
during this first phase (the current proposal) of our efforts, but more
importantly will provide guidance for further research and development work we
anticipate will be forthcoming.
The Rural Studio is internationally
known for providing unique educational opportunities for architecture students
while serving the needs of the poor of Hale and surrounding counties. The Rural Studio recently has expanded its
educational mission to include students working in fields other than
architecture. Our proposed work would
fit well with this initiative while offering a concrete opportunity for work of
the Rural Studio to become more integrated into the local economy through
incorporation of locally-produced materials into student projects. In addition to inspiring designs and improved
housing quality for individual families, promotion of the use of local
materials by the Rural Studio could help local loggers and wood processors
establish viable businesses in an area desperate for jobs and income. rk designed to identify such needs
and the USDA Forest Service has made no specific commitment. We do believe, however, that the research we
are proposing is entirely consistent with the USDA Forest Service’s interests
in promoting forest-based rural development in the South. We believe participation of these
collaborators will facilitate the flow of external funding for continued
support of our efforts well beyond the term of our proposed project.
Progress to
Date
On projects of this kind, a slow
start is not unusual. In our proposal,
it was very clear that much of the field research would be done by graduate
students. Funding became available in
June and we had graduate students recruited and in place in August. While taking necessary courses for their
degree programs, they also conducted research to prepare them for working in
the field. Pat Kennealy
developed a research report summarizing government housing programs directed at
rural areas. Beau Brodbeck
documented the consolidation in sawmill capacity and
the consequent decline in number of small sawmills across the state. Both Pat and Beau have developed detailed proposals for their thesis
research and are in the process of having these critiqued by faculty on their
thesis advisory committee. Beau has a
degree in Forestry and several years experience working as a consulting
forester in
Reny Tuinstra joined our project team in February. Her interests are in sustainable development,
and she is particularly interested in how non-governmental organizations (NGOs)
can partner with universities in pursuit of common goals. She will write a report of her observations.
Two papers are being prepared for an
academic conference in August (Rural Sociological Society). Mark Dubois, Conner Bailey, Pat Kennealy, and Beau Brodbeck will
attend. Abstracts of the papers are
posted at our project website: <
http://www.ag.auburn.edu/~cbailey/aaes.htm
>.
Future
Directions
The research plan developed at the
outset was designed to identify opportunities and obstacles associated with
creating economic opportunities within a locally-based forest industry. Evolution of this project will depend on the
insights and leadership provided by local NGOs and other citizens. This is especially important because
leadership within both HERO and the Federation of Southern Cooperatives has
changed since the project was first discussed.
A meeting is scheduled for late
March or early April 2004 when the various stakeholders will meet together and
discuss what they hope to achieve from this project, and what they believe they
can contribute to the common enterprise.