
DISCLAIMER: Please remember that all information presented is a summary of research and not an endorsement of any product or a recommendation of chemicals. The official labels from the manufacturing companies offer the legal and proper use and handling information for all products.
This has been a hectic month with hurricane activity taking top priority. With the many reports coming in on damage, it appears there was more structural damage with Katrina than Ivan or Dennis. Alabama people feel so fortunate compared to our neighbors in Mississippi and Louisiana that they are just thankful for relatively less damage. KEN'S MUSINGS
ALNLA and ALFA are working hard with our legislators to make sure we get help from the TAP program so that our industry can get some assistance with clean-up funds. If you ever wondered why you should belong to your state nursery association, this is one great reason. Without a consolidated voice that speaks as an industry, your concerns often go unheard and you receive little attention. Cyberspace is hopping with your leadership in ALNLA and cooperative efforts from Louisiana and Mississippi to be sure the Green Industry is not passed over again when recovery help is extended.
KEEP RECORDS!!!! You will need to document your expenses for recovery with receipts and pictures. Keep track of hours, labor, materials and take before and after pictures so you can accurately document your recovery efforts.
Looking back to past hurricanes, we are now putting together training materials for landscape contractors who will be receiving money from the state for replacement tree plantings. Selection and handling of nursery trees, site analysis and design features and planting and maintenance specifications for replanting our urban forests are also included (see below). I went to a meeting in Florida to discuss the latest research available on successful planting in a hurricane region. They have been abused a great deal in the past 5 to 10 years and have learned some valuable lessons. Below is a list of these recommendations which will be posted permanently on our web site.
The rest of the topics for the month include research presented by our faculty and students at SNA. If you want any more information on these research efforts, please give us a call.
Best Management Practices (BMPs) for successful landscape tree establishment in the urban environment depends on the design, site analysis, tree species selection, and proper planting and maintenance. All these factors are interrelated. Compromises to any of the BMPs are cumulative and affect other establishment factors. Successive compromises result in stress to the tree with potential death or failure of the planting. Each factor will be highlighted separately but keep in mind that all factors are evaluated with attention to the other three factors. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES FOR URBAN TREES
Evaluation of the site to develop the design is the first step in a tree planting program. Once you know the restraints of the site and the design requirements, plants can be selected and planting and maintenance specifications written to meet the site limitations. The following points should be considered during the site evaluation and design process:
Best Management Practices for Successful Urban Tree Plantings Specifications for Tree Selection
- The USDA hardiness zones for Alabama are Zones 8 and 9. Hardiness is not as big a concern as tolerance to heat and low chilling hours or photoperiod required for proper bud set of some tree species.
- Is irrigation available?
- What is the light exposure: sun or shade?
- What is the soil nutrition analysis, especially pH, phosphorus and potassium? These nutrients are better adjusted according to the soil test prior to planting.
- What is the internal soil drainage? Test by digging a hole 18 inches deep and filling it with water. If water is gone in 1 to 2 hours, the soil is well drained; 12 to 24 hours, soil drainage is moderate; more than 24 hours, soil drainage is poor.
- What is the distance to the soil water table? Dig a hole 2 feet deep and wait 2 to 3 hours to see if water fills the hole. If water appears in the hole, there is a high water table. Is there a hard pan that limits drainage or is it a high water table?
- Is the soil texture clay, loam or sandy?
- Is the soil density compacted/hard or loose?
- Will your trees be planted in an open park setting, a sidewalk tree cut or a planting strip? What are the dimensions of the root zone space and volume of soil available for tree growth?
- Is there a swimming pool, septic tank, vegetable garden, annual planting bed within 50 feet of the planting area?
- What is the distance between the tree planting and any building?
- Are there underground or above ground utilities or lights that need to be considered?
- Is there a budget for pruning and maintenance of the trees?
- Are there landscaping or tree ordinances that would affect selection and size of trees?
- What is an assessment of tree diversity in the area?
- Are the trees to be used for a screen, shade or a focal point?
- What trees currently exist in the planting area? What construction activities have recently gone on that might impact these trees? Are they healthy, desirable trees?
- What are the size, shape, texture, color, evergreen/deciduous requirements of the trees needed for the design?
- Are there storefronts, signs, traffic vision concerns or other views that may need to be considered in the selection of the trees?
Successful landscape plantings can only occur when high quality nursery stock is selected which has the proper limb structure and root/shoot ratio balance. Trees should be healthy, free of disease and insect pests, and the quality should be maintained during transportation from the nursery and throughout the planting process. The following check list offers “minimum” guidelines for selection of trees for the landscape.Shade trees should:
Have a strong, straight central leader with no lateral branches greater than 2/3s the caliper of the main leader. Have branches equally spaced around the central leader at least 6 inches apart. Each branch should have its own space. Have a uniform canopy in shape from all sides and free of large voids. Have trunks which are free from all cuts and scratches. There should be no more that 40% of the height which is clear of branches unless it is specified by the designer. Have proper pruning cuts that are not flush cuts but pruned to the collar. Have root balls in B&B plantings which are of the appropriate size (see below) and they should be firm with no loose movement between the trunk and the root ball when the trunk is rotated. Have container roots which fill the entire container without having any root greater than 1/5 the tree caliper and no large roots in the upper 3 inches of media encircling more than 1/3 of the root ball. If kinked roots are less than 1/3 of the root ball, they can be pruned. Have tree branches with good spacing and wide angles from the main trunk with no included bark. Be smaller rather than larger. Plant 1.5 to 3.5 inch caliper trees unless instant effect is desired and good soil conditions permit a large planting. Smaller trees establish better in poorly drained, low oxygen soils. Standards for Various Container and Field Grown B&B Trees
The following tables, taken from the American and Florida standards and grades for nursery stock, offer a guide to the MINIMUM acceptable industry standards for root balls and container sizes for field and container grown trees. When selecting trees from the nursery, be sure that the nursery stock meets or exceeds these guidelines.
The optimum tree size depending on your need for instant effect and your site requirements should fall between 1.5 and 3.5 inches in caliper.
ROOT BALL SIZE STANDARDS Trunk caliper (inches) Minimum ball diameter on field grown shade trees Minimum root ball diameter on fabric container grown trees Minimum container size (gallons) Minimum tree height on standard trees Minimum tree height on slower grown trees Maximum tree height 1 16 12 5 6 5 10 2 24 18 20 10 8 14 3 32 20 45 12 9.5 16 4 42 30 95 14 10.5 18 5 54 36 95 . . .
ROOT BALL DEPTH AND DIAMETER Root ball diameter (inches) Minimum root ball depth Less than 20 Not less than 75% of diameter 20-30 Not less than 66% of diameter 31-48 Not less than 60% of diameter Source: American Standard for Nursery Stock, ANSI Z60.1 published by American Association of Nurserymen, Washington D.C. The complete publication can be found on line at:
http://www.anla.org/applications/Documents/Docs/ANLAStandard2004.pdf. The University of Florida developed their own grades and standards for minimum container size recommendations for trees grown in aboveground and fabric containers, http://hort.ifas.ufl.edu/woody/planting/americanstandard.htm.Caliper is measured 6 inches from the ground on trees less than 4 inches in caliper. Above 4 inches in caliper measure at 6 inch height; move to 12 inches above the ground to measure trunk caliper or diameter.
BARE ROOT CALIPER, TREE HEIGHT AND ROOT SPREAD Caliper (inches) Average height range (feet) Minimum root spread (inches) .5 5-6 12 .75 6-8 16 1 8-10 18 1.25 8-10 20 1.5 10-12 22 1.75 10-12 24 2 12-14 28 2.5 12-14 32 3 14-16 38 Example: If your tree is 2.5 inches in caliper the average height should measure between 12 and 14 feet and the root spread should be a minimum of 32 inches.
BOX SIZE FOR TREES Box diameter Maximum caliper range (inches) 20 1.25-2 24 1.5-2.5 30 2.5-3 36 2.5-3.5 42 3-4 48 3.5-5 60 4-6 Source: American Standard for Nursery Stock, ANSI Z60.1 published by American Association of Nurserymen, Washington D.C. The complete publication can be found on line at: http://www.anla.org/applications/Documents/Docs/ANLAStandard2004.pdf. The University of Florida has developed their own grades and standards for minimum container size recommendations for trees grown in aboveground and fabric containers, http://hort.ifas.ufl.edu/woody/planting/americanstandard.htm.
Caliper is measured 6 inches from the ground on trees less than 4 inches in caliper. Above 4 inches in caliper at 6 inch height, move to 12 inches above the ground to measure trunk caliper or diameter.
Best Management Practices for Successful Urban Tree Plantings
Planting and Maintenance Specifications
Best Management Practices (BMPs) for successful landscape tree establishment in the urban environment depends on the design, site analysis, tree species selection, and proper planting and maintenance. All these factors are interrelated. Compromises to any of the BMPs affect other establishment factors and result in stress to the tree with potential death or failure of the planting. Each factor will be highlighted separately but keep in mind that all factors are evaluated with attention to the other three factors.Once the proper tree has been selected to fit the site and the landscape design, proper planting and follow-up care are required for the success of the project. The following points should be considered during the planting process:
- High quality plant material is maintained on the site under shade and with twice daily irrigation. Plants are healed-in if B&B material is used.
- Trees should be protected from extreme temperatures, freezing or extreme heat.
- Always handle tree by the root ball using straps or powered equipment and do not lift using branches or the trunk. The trunk should be wrapped during shipping and the planting process for protection.
- Inspect roots of container trees and remove any large roots that are circling over 1/3 of the root ball especially in the upper 2 to 3 inches of the root ball. Removing very large roots can result in excessive stress and possible death of the tree.
- The hole should be dug 2 to 3 times wider than the root ball to allow easy access by the roots into the surrounding soil and no deeper than the root ball.
- Most urban soils are compacted and poorly drained resulting in low oxygen for the roots. Plant the tree with the roots at least 1 to 3 inches above the soil line with the trunk flare/root flare and uppermost roots at least level with the backfill surrounding the tree.
- Soil removed from the hole makes the best backfill unless the whole planting area can be amended uniformly. There is no apparent benefit from root stimulants, water absorbing gels, mycorrhizae or fertilizer at planting.
- Gradually straighten the tree as backfill is added.
- Remove synthetic wraps, rope, twine from the tree and ball. Wire baskets should be removed when possible but research and practical application allows for removing at least the top 2 rungs of the basket. Although wire does not deteriorate, roots grow to encapsulate wire without apparent damage.
- Slice a shovel or spade around the backfill to settle the soil and remove air pockets. Break up heavy clay clods. Do not step firmly on the backfill which may cause excessive compaction.
- Irrigate with 10 to 20 gallons of water to the root ball and surrounding soil. Apply 2 to 3 inches of mulch to the edge of the root ball extending 6 to 8 feet from the tree. Do not pile mulch against the trunk of the tree.
- Only a thin layer of mulch and no soil should be on the top of the original root ball allowing the roots surrounding the root ball to be on the surface and water to penetrate into the root ball.
- Stake the tree if the planting is in a windy area or an area of high traffic. If the tree is leaning due to lack of taper or strength, tree selection was improper. Many trees with heavy root balls do not need staking.
Maintenance Requirements for Successful Tree Planting
Trees provided with regular irrigation, 3 times per week, for the first growing season will stimulate greater root growth. Establishment period is about 6 months for each inch tree caliper (ex. 3” caliper = 18 month establishment period) Two to three gallons of water is required for each caliper inch of tree. Irrigation is applied to the root ball. If root ball is wet, do not irrigate. Pruning should have been done at the nursery. No pruning for the first year after planting. Pruning can inhibit root growth and establishment. Maintain 8’ mulch area surrounding tree and limit traffic to prevent compaction. No grass or weeds are allowed close to the trunk. Inspect planted trees to be sure they were not planted too deep and root flare is distinctly visible. Remember to remove all stakes after first year. Pruning is required after year 2 to remove lower limbs to lift canopy and maintain central leader, limb spacing and arrangement of limbs on the central trunk. Proper pruning cuts are required, (no flush cuts!). Trees respond to fertility after year one primarily to Nitrogen (N) at a rate of 3 to 5 pounds of N per 1000 ft. If phosphorus and potassium have been adjusted to a medium level or better, those nutrients should be sufficient. A split application of fertilizer in winter and again in mid June should result in maximum growth potential. Ken
334-844-5484 Office
tiltken@auburn.edu
NOTE: The names of current graduate students at Auburn are highlighted in maroon.
By Daike Tian, Ken Tilt, Jeff Sibley, Fenny Dane and Floyd Woods SNA Student Paper: EFFECTS OF SOIL LEVEL AND FERTILIZATION ON PERFORMANCE OF CONTAINER LOTUS
Lotus is an impressive flowering rhizomatous, perennial, aquatic herb, which has a long history in the diverse cultures of the Orient. The plant is sacred in the Hindu and Buddhist religions. Sacred lotus has been cultivated in Asia for thousands of years and has been a prestigious crop in China for nearly 5,000 years. A developing and open world economy has led to increasing exchanges and meshing of cultures, ideas and horticultural treasures. With the exciting discovery of viable 2,000 years old lotus seeds, this plant has moved into the spotlight and the lotus industry is blooming in the world.
Little research is available on nursery production of Nelumbo nucifera Gaertn. (lotus). ‘No1’, an unnamed seedling (medium sized, with few emerging leaves and flowers) was used in testing the effect of fertilization rates. Lotus rhizomes were divided and planted. After planting, all pots were filled with water. The application of soluble fertilizer increased growth parameters. One teaspoon of 20-10-20 (Pro•Sol) every 20 days was sufficient for good growth in a 15 gallon container. Two teaspoons increased root weight, number of propagules and number of expanded internodes but also stimulated proliferation of algae growth in the beginning stage. ‘Embolene’ (medium sized, with numerous leaves and flowers) and ‘98 Seed’ (large unnamed seedling with numerous leaves, few but large flowers) were used in examining the effect of container soil level on the growth of lotus. Containers half filled with soil worked better than those three fourths full. Treatments of fertilizer rate and soil level had little effect on the concentration of macronutrients but significantly influenced concentration of some micronutrients especially B in young leaves.
By Brian E. Jackson, Amy N. Wright, and Jeff L. Sibley SNA Student Paper: EFFECT OF COTTON GIN COMPOST AND PINE BARK SUBSTRATE BLENDS ON ROOT GROWTH OF TWO HORTICLTURE CROPS
Pine bark (PB) and peat (P) are two of the most common substrate components currently used in horticultural crop production. The supply, consistency, and cost of these materials has often been a concern for growers throughout the United States. These concerns have prompted the search for alternative substrates and substrate components that can be successfully utilized for quality crop production. Cotton is a major agronomic crop grown in the southeast United States. Cotton gin trash (CGT) is the term used to describe the by-products of the cotton ginning process that includes the leaves, stems, hulls, and some lint. Composted cotton gin trash (CGC) has been shown to be a useful substrate component for production of bedding plants, floral crops, and woody ornamentals.
Frequently excluded from horticultural research, root growth and root system architecture are important factors influencing plant performance and survival. A healthy, functioning root system increases the surface area available for the uptake of water and nutrients. In addition, roots provide physical support, storage, and anchorage needed by plants. Understanding root growth and development is important to improving plant quality and production success.
The objective of this study was to utilize the Horhizotron™ to evaluate root growth of weeping fig (Ficus benjamina) and ‘Hot Country’ lantana (Lantana camara Mill. ‘Hot Country’) when grown in various blends of PB and CGC. The Horhizotron provided a simple, non-destructive method for measuring root growth and development in various root environments and substrates, and it allows roots to be observed and quantified as they grow from the original root ball and penetrate into the surrounding substrate .
Treatments were four substrate blends of milled PB and CGC that included by volume: 100:0 PB:CGC, 60:40 PB:CGC, 40:60 PB:CGC, and 0:100 PB:CGC. Pine bark substrate was used as the control. Dolomitic limestone was added where needed to achieve pH levels of 6.0. Weeping fig and ‘Hot Country’ lantana were removed from 3 gallon containers and placed in separate Horhizotrons on greenhouse benches at the Paterson Greenhouse Complex, Auburn University. Root balls of all plants were positioned in the center of each Horhizotron and each quadrant was randomly filled with one of the substrate blends to the height of the root ball. Plants were hand watered daily and fertilized once weekly.
Root length and location in the quadrant profile were measured as newly formed roots grew out from the root ball and along the face of the glass quadrants. A transparent grid placed on the two glass sides of each quadrant allowed observation and measurement of the five longest roots on each side of the quadrant. Over the course of the study root measurements were discontinued when roots reached the end of the Horhizotron quadrant. Root development in all CGC blended substrates was considerable enough to firmly hold the substrates together when plants were removed from the Horhizotrons. The quadrant containing 100% PB shattered upon being pulled from the Horhizotron, a result of less root proliferation in that substrate. This experiment provides strong evidence that roots can grow effectively and vigorously in substrates containing CGC, facilitating successful establishment and production of horticultural crops.
By Brad E. Reeder, Wheeler G. Foshee, III and Raymond L. Kessler SNA Student Paper: PRODUCTION OF SNAPDRAGONS IN A HIGH TUNNEL IN SOUTHEAST ALABAMA
Cut snapdragons are a multimillion-dollar crop but there are very few growers in Alabama where direct marketing has great potential. This study examined the possibility of exploring that potential by the use of high tunnels which have been used extensively in Europe and the Middle East for production of vegetables, annuals, biennials, and other horticultural crops.
High tunnels are covered with a single layer of six-mil polyethylene and are ventilated by manually rolling up the sides. There are no permanent heating or cooling systems in the high tunnel but water is supplied for drip/trickle irrigation. Pennsylvania State University has extensively investigated production of many horticultural crops grown in high tunnels (including snapdragons - Antirrhinum majus). Their high tunnel production system utilizes many of the traditional production methods of field plasticulture.
Recent research has shown that snapdragons grown inside a high tunnel had longer stems than those field grown. The objective of this study was to evaluate preplant nitrogen (N) rates with a control release fertilizer and to determine optimum snapdragon spacing. A single high tunnel (21’x96’) was constructed utilizing the Pennsylvania State University design at the Wiregrass Research Station located in southeast Alabama. Plants were grown on black plastic mulched beds (18 inches) that were prepared with a mulch-bedder (Reddick Fumigants, Williamston NC) and underlain with Tee-tape (0.45 gpm/100ft) for irrigation purposes. Irrigation was applied once a week at a rate of 1.0 acre-inch.
Total stem length and inflorescence length peaked at the 240 lbs. N/A rate with the Polyon 19-6-12. Stem diameter did not peak at this rate. The stem diameters from the 240 lbs N/A rate were only 0.1mm smaller than the 360 lbs. N/A rate and 0.2mm smaller than the 160 lbs N/A rate. The 3x4 inch spacing yielded longer inflorescence length, stem length, and larger stem diameter compared to plants in the 4x4 or the 4x5 inch spacing. Our system (growing three rows on each black-plastic row) would allow for the greatest number of snapdragons per square foot of bed space (in our high tunnel the yield would be 6,750 plants per planting in about 6-8 weeks).
Samples from this experiment were delivered to three local florists for a non-replicated evaluation. All of the florists rated these snapdragons in the ‘excellent’ category and indicated that they would purchase comparable snapdragons if grown locally throughout the year.
by Adam Newby, James Altland, Charles Gilliam, Donna Fare, and Glenn Wehtje SNA Student Paper: PREEMERGENCE CONTROL OF Marchantia polymorpha
Liverwort (Marchantia polymorpha) is an increasing problem in container-grown ornamental production within the Southeast. Prostrate leaf-like structures of liverwort known as thalli create a mat over media surfaces in containers. Not only is liverwort unsightly, it can impede water and nutrient movement into the root zone. It thrives in low UV light, high fertility and high moisture environments. Since it is an emerging problem, little research exists on preemergence controls. There are promising new products for postemergence liverwort control, but preventing liverwort infestations would be more desirable.
Full-gallon containers were filled with a 6:1 pine bark to sand substrate amended with 14 lb of Polyon 18-6-12, 5 lb of dolomitic lime, and 1.5 lb of Micromax per cubic yard. Twelve granular herbicides were applied at the recommended rate: Broadstar (150 lb product/A), Kansel Plus (100 lb product/A), OH2 (100 lb product/A), Pendulum 2G (200 lb/A), Regal 0-0 (100 lb/A), Regal Kade (200 lb/A), Regal Star (200 lb/A), Ronstar (200 lb/A), Rout (100 lb/A), and Snapshot (200 lb/A). Treatments were applied using a handheld shaker. After treatment, each replication was placed around a container of mature liverwort for inoculation. The study was conducted under 47% shade. Overhead irrigation was split into two cycles per day with a total of 0.25” applied.
This study showed that Broadstar and Ronstar provide superior preemergence control of liverwort compared to the other herbicides tested. It should be noted that there are no preemergence herbicides registered for use in enclosed structures.
by Adam Newby, James Altland, Charles Gilliam, Glenn Wehtje, and Donna Fare SNA Student Paper: CONTROLLING LIVERWORT INFESTATIONS
Liverwort continues to spread throughout the Southeast as a weed problem in container-grown ornamental crops. Liverwort thalli can cover the entire media surface of a container and restrict water and nutrient movement into the root zone, as well as reduce the marketability of a crop. Propagation houses, shade houses, and other covered structures provide ideal conditions for liverwort.
One herbicide with potential is quinoclamine which has been used as an algaecide in Japan for decades. It is produced as a 25% wettable powder. Quinoclamine has proven to be very effective on postemergence liverwort control, and it is safe on a broad range of ornamental crops. Previous research suggests that lower rates and spray volumes provide adequate postemergence control. The nursery industry in Germany has used diuron for liverwort control. Diuron is a substituted urea herbicide widely used in cotton production within the Southeast. It is highly active and inexpensive. The objectives of this study were to evaluate lower rates and spray volumes of quinoclamine than current recommendations and any interaction between rate and volume, as well as evaluate the effectiveness of diuron for liverwort control.
This study was conducted at Auburn University. Liverwort was grown in full-gallon containers consisting of a 6:1 pine bark to sand substrate amended with 14 lb of Polyon 18-6-12, 5 lb of dolomitic lime, and 1.5 lb of Micromax per cubic yard. Postemergence treatments were applied when liverwort covered at least 60% of the container surface. Diuron 4L and Linuron (another substituted urea herbicide with similar chemistry to diuron) 4L were each applied. All treatments were applied with a CO2 backpack sprayer fitted with an 8004 flat fan nozzle at 30 PSI. A non-treated control group was maintained. In addition to liverwort, all treatments were also applied to 6 single pot replications of Humata tyermanii (Rabbit foot fern) and Euphorvia pulcherrima (Poinsettia). The study was conducted in a temperature controlled greenhouse under 0.25 inch overhead cyclic irrigation per day split into two cycles.
Main effects of quinoclamine rate, volume, as well as the interaction thereof were found to be significant. In general, control increased as rate and spray volume increased. Among quinoclamine treatments, higher spray volume provided greater control with lower rates. Conversely, lower spray volumes (54 gal/A) can provide adequate control at higher rates (1.0 and 2.0 oz product/A). By 70 DAT, 2.0 oz product/gal applied at 54 and 109 gal/A had the least percent liverwort coverage among the quinoclamine treatments with 40% and 22% coverage. All other quinoclamine treatments had a higher percentage of liverwort coverage. Quinoclamine treatments were compared to Diuron and Linuron treatments as well as the non-treated control group. No injury was recorded on Humata tyermanii or Euphorvia pulcherrima at any time throughout the study.
The research data showed that quinoclamine rate and volume of application influence postemergence liverwort control. Rate and spray volume may best be determined by individual growers. This study also recognizes Diuron as a promising treatment for liverwort with excellent long term control.
By Ben M. Richardson, Charles H. Gilliam, Glenn R. Wehtje, Glenn B. Fain SNA Student Paper: A NON-CHEMICAL ALTERNATIVE FOR
WEED CONTROL IN CONTAINER NURSERY CROPSContainer nursery crops are among the most valuable crops produced in the Southeast. Weeds can reduce the value of nursery crops by reducing growth through competitive effects and reduced salability due to consumer demand for weed free crops. Growers primarily use preemergence herbicides for weed control. However, demand has increased for nursery crops grown in large containers. Preemergence herbicides are often impractical as the increased spacing between containers results in over 50% of the herbicide falling outside of the containers. Hand weeding is another expensive option and and labor costs continue to increase.
Fresh pine bark nugget mulch could be an alternative. It has been used for many years in landscape beds to control weeds and could be an option for use in container crops. Physical properties of fresh pine bark are conducive to weed control as it is hydrophobic with limited water holding capacity due to the large particle size. Pine bark is well suited to be spread uniformly as a mulch, covering the entire surface of the container while other mulch type products may leave cracks for weeds to establish. What needs to be determined is whether it can be effective for weed control; and the depth of mulch required for that purpose.
These studies were conducted in Auburn, Alabama. Crapemyrtle (Lagerstroemia x ‘Acoma’) were transplanted from trade gallon containers into 7 gallon containers. The substrate used was a 6:1 (v:v) aged pine bark: sand amended with 2.3 kg (5lb) of dolimitic lime, 6.4kg (14lb) of Polyon 18-6-12. and 0.68kg (1.5lb) of Micromax. All plants were potted to equal depths, approximately 3 inches below the top of the container and were irrigated twice prior to treatment. Three treatments consisted of broadcasting 25 bittercress (Cardamine hirsuta) seed on the surface of the substrate of each container, then coarse pine bark nugget mulch was hand applied at 0, 1.5 and 3 inches respectively. The nuggets averaged in size from 0.79 in to 2.36 in flakes. Two other treatments consisted of first applying mulch at 1.5 or 3 inches, then broadcasting the bittercress seeds on top of the mulch. These procedures were also applied to five more treatments and a granular herbicide (Broadstar 0.25G at 150 lb product/A) was applied after all mulch and seed were present.
In a similar study, common gardenia (Gardenia jasminoides) were transplanted from trade gallon containers into 7 gallon containers. The same treatments were applied to the gardenia except 25 oxalis (Oxalis stricta) seed were used per container instead of bittercress. In both studies, data collected were weed number per container at 30, 60, 90 and 180 days after treatment (DAT) and percent coverage of weeds at 60, 90, 180 DAT. These studies show that pine bark mulch can provide effective weed control for nursery crops grown in large containers. At 180 DAT oxalis was present in the no mulch, no herbicide treatment which contained 3.9 weeds and averaged 35 % coverage of container surface. All other treatments resulted in minimal oxalis growth . The combination of mulch plus herbicide provided complete oxalis control 180DAT.
At 180 DAT bittercress was growing vigorously in the control containers (no mulch-no herbicide). These containers averaged 8.1 bittercress, 100% coverage of container surface and 59.6 g of bittercress per container. In comparison no herbicide, 1.5 inches of mulch treatment with seeding after mulching, averaged 2.6 weeds, 44% coverage of container surface and 33.7 g per container. Both treatments resulted in greater bittercress growth than all other treatments. Similar to the oxalis study, the combination of mulch plus herbicide provided complete bittercress control 180 DAT and no herbicide or mulch application affected growth of crapemyrtle or gardenia.
By Kevin M. Brooks, Gary J. Keever, Jeff L. Sibley and James E. Altland SNA Student Paper: GROWTH AND FLOWERING RESPONSE OF CRAPEMYRTLE TO TREE SHELTERS
Our research shows that the use of tree shelters in the production of tree-form crapemyrtles can increase height growth while minimally affecting caliper growth. ‘Dynamite’ and ‘Potomac’ were 124% and 61% taller at the end of the season when grown in tree shelters, while height growth of ‘Tuscarora’ was not affected by tree shelters. Caliper of sheltered and non-sheltered ‘Tuscarora’ and ‘Dynamite’ were similar at the end of the season, while caliper of ‘Potomac’ was 35% less when grown in shelters. Tree shelters may provide growers with a low-input way to accelerate production of tree-form crapemyrtles.
Crapemyrtle are vigorous growers under nursery conditions; however, most cultivars begin flowering by early summer, resulting in a reduction in vegetative growth rate, particularly growth in height. This problem is often compounded by heavy fruit set later in the growing season. Pruning of inflorescences is labor-intensive and results in rapid re-bloom. For production of standard (single trunk) or multi-trunk (usually 3) tree-forms of crapemyrtle with a central leader and four to six feet of clear trunk, pruning exacerbates the problem by stimulating new shoot formation, often from the main trunk. Flowering and heavy fruit set can result in longer production cycles.
Tree shelters, translucent tubes placed around tree seedlings, create a beneficial microclimate within the shelter of increased humidity and CO2 levels and reduced drying and mechanical damage from wind. Growth increases of 60 to 600% from using tree shelters have been reported. Shelters can typically increase height growth but reduce the rate of trunk diameter growth which may result in trees without enough structural support to stand upright. Tree shelters have been broadly used in Great Britain and other countries to cut costs of establishing small forest and landscape trees.
Blue-X tree shelters (McKnew Enterprises, Elk Grove, CA) are fabricated from partially transparent blue-tinted polyester film and that amplifies blue light and reduces UV light within the shelter. According to the manufacturer, the amplified blue light increases photosynthetically active radiation resulting in increased trunk diameter in addition to accelerated growth in height and enhanced transplant survival. The objective of this research was to determine the effects of Blue-X tree shelters on height and caliper growth of tree-form crapemyrtle, with a goal of shortening the production time.
‘Dynamite’ grown in Blue-X tree shelters were consistently taller than non-sheltered trees: 118%, 128%, and 124% taller in August, September, and October, respectively, than controls. Calipers of ‘Dynamite’ in shelters and controls differed in early to mid season but not at the end of the season. In July, 30% of the ‘Dynamite’ controls were flowering while none of the trees grown in shelters had begun flowering. Height growth of ‘Potomac’ was also promoted by shelters, with trees grown in shelters 61% taller than the controls at the end of the season. Caliper growth for non-sheltered ‘Potomac’ was 35% greater than those with shelters at the end of the season. By August the ‘Potomac’ controls had flowered but not the sheltered trees. Height of ‘Tuscarora’ was not influenced by the Blue-X tree shelters, whereas caliper was 47% less in July when grown in shelters. However, by the end the season, calipers were similar for trees in the two treatments. ‘Tuscarora’ exhibited similar flowering characteristics as the other two cultivars in response to the treatments, with trees grown in the shelters flowering later than the controls. No cultivar had any flowering inside the tree shelters.
Blue-X tree shelters significantly increased height growth in two of the three cultivars tested without affecting caliper at the end of the season. Growing crapemyrtles in Blue-X tree shelters may shorten production time by enhancing height growth.
Jackie Mullen, Extension Plant Pathology Specialist-Auburn PLANT PATHOLOGY REPORT - JULY 2005
Jim Jacobi, Extension Plant Pathology Specialist-Birmingham
Charles Ray, Research Fellow IV-AuburnAuburn Plant Disease Report-July 2005 (J. Mullen)
Many of the 267 July plant samples were ornamentals submitted by the State Department of Agriculture. These plant submission were part of a state and national survey of nurseries to detect Phytophthora ramorum (Sudden Oak Death). Forty-eight ornamental samples were submitted from nurseries by State Department of Agriculture Inspectors in July; 198 total samples were submitted from Nurseries (May 9-July 22). These samples were tested using visual study, microscopic study, and ELISA testing for Phytophthora. For all ELISA positive samples (There were none in July, 47 total nursery samples; 51 total samples), the DNA was extracted and sent by overnight mail to the USDA Beltsville molecular lab. PCR analyses were performed and results were sent to the Alabama State Plant Health Director (USDA-APHIS). From USDA-APHIS in AL, results were forwarded to the State Plant Regulatory Official and our lab. The State Plant Regulatory Official contacts the Inspectors who communicate with the growers. So far we have results back on 21 nursery samples, and all 21 analyses have been negative. It is too hot right now to sample for P. ramorum, but more survey work is planned for this fall.The above procedure was also followed by Inspectors when homeowner sample testing was requested. In total we tested 41 homeowner samples. Six samples were tested in July and none tested positive for Phytophthora using ELISA. (Four samples in June tested ELISA positive for Phytophthora; PCR results were negative for all four for P. ramorum.) This fall we hope more homeowners will request testing when they observe symptoms. If calls come to Extension offices, and appropriate, suspect samples are described, please forward client names and contact information to the State Department of Agriculture at tjohnson@agi.state.al.us.
Rust was confirmed on kudzu in Baldwin County in early August and Conecuh County on 8/24/05.
Other diseases of note in July include bacterial leaf spot on azalea, Fusarium solani stem rot and wilt on chrysanthemum, bacterial wilt on pepper, and tomato spotted wilt on zinnia. Anthracnose has been a common leaf spot disease on camellia and some other ornamental shrubs. Bacterial leaf spots have been common on a number of plants including azalea, cottonwood, lotus, maple, kudzu, and oak. Exact identification will be made shortly by the gas chromatography method.
*Counties are not reported for nursery, greenhouse, and golf course samples.
July Plant Diseases Seen in the Auburn Plant Diagnostic Lab PLANT PROBLEM COUNTY Ash Anthracnose (Colletotrichum) Jefferson Azalea Anthracnose (Colletotrichum) *(2) Azalea Bacterial Leaf Spots *(4) Azalea Phytophthora Leaf Spots * Bermuda Spring Dead Spot
(Gaeumannomyces,
graminis var. graminisJefferson Boxwood Macrophoma Crown Rot Limestone Boxwood Volutella Blight Limestone Camellia Anthracnose (Colletotrichu) *(7), Tuscaloosa Camellia Bacterial Leaf Spot * Chrysanthemum Fusarium solani
Stem Rot & Wilt on Mum* Cottonwood Bacterial Leaf Spot Houston Crape Myrtle Botrytis Dieback Tuscaloosa Dogwood Cercospora Leaf Spot Marengo Holly Anthracnose (Colletotrichum) * Kudzu Bacterial Leaf Spot Autauga, Choctaw,
Clarke, Marengo,
WilcoxKudzu Septoria Leaf Spot Choctaw, Henry,
Jefferson, Marengo,
Tuscaloosa, WilcoxLeucothoe Anthracnose (Colletotrichum) Tuscaloosa Lotus Bacterial Leaf Spot Cullman Maple Anthracnose (Colletotrichum) *(4) Maple Bacterial Leaf Spot * Maple Phyllosticta Leaf Spot * Oak Anthracnose (Colletotrichum) Baldwin, Talladega Oak Bacterial Leaf Sptos Baldwin Oak Fusiforme Rust (Cronartium
quercuum var. fusiforme)Baldwin, Jefferson Oak Phyllosticta Leaf Spot * Oak Powdery Mildew * Oak, Shumard Bacterial Leaf Spot * Oak, Shumard Fungal Canker * Pieris Anthracnose (Colletotrichum) * Viburnum Anthracnose (Colletotrichum) *(6) Zinnia Tomato Spotted Wilt Virus * Zoysia Rust (Puccinia sp.) Colbert Zoysia Slime Mold (Physarum) Lee Zoysia Take-All Patch (Gaeumannomyces
graminis var. graminis)Jefferson Monthly Plant Problem Report From The Birmingham Lab (J. Jacobi)
We received 129 plant samples during July. Problems seen last month included Pythium and Rhizoctonia root rot on ajuga, bacterial leaf spot and Phytophthora root rot on chrysanthemum, downy mildew on coleus. Downy mildew on coleus was a new disease, not previously reported in Alabama. Foliar symptoms included angular necrotic spots, with a dense covering of gray-brown cotton-like mycelial growth. This fungus also attacks other hosts, including salvia.
JULY 2005 Plant Diseases Seen In The Birmingham Plant Diagnostic Lab PLANT PROBLEM COUNTY Ajuga Pythium Root Rot Tuscaloosa Ajuga Rhizoctonia Root and Crown Rot Jefferson Azalea Azalea Lacebug Shelby Azalea Pythium Root Rot Shelby Bentgrass Anthracnose *(2) Bentgrass Brown Patch (Rhizoctonia zeae) * Bentgrass Pythium Root Dysfunction *(2) Boxwood, Common Boxwood Mites Jefferson, Shelby Boxwood, Common Leaf Miners Jefferson(2) Boxwood, Common Macrophoma Leaf Blight Jefferson(2) Boxwood, Common Volutella Blight Jefferson Chrysanthemum Bacterial Leaf Spot Bibb Chrysanathemum Phytophthora Root Rot Bibb Coleus Downy Mildew (Plasmopara) Jefferson Crape Myrtle Powdery Mildew Tuscaloosa Cypress, Leyland Phytophthora Root Rot Jefferson Daylilly Leaf Streak Jefferson Dogwood, Flowering Phyllosticta Leaf Spot Jefferson Dogwood, Flowering Powdery Mildew Tuscaloosa(2) Dogwood, Flowering Spot Anthracnose Tuscaloosa Dogwood, Gray Dogwood Sawfly Jefferson Dogwood, Kousa Leaf Scorch Jefferson Elm, Winged Dutch Elm Disease Shelby Hawthorne Quince Rust Jefferson Holly, Japanese Two-Lined Spittlebug Damage Jefferson Holly, Lusterleaf Pythium Root Rot Jefferson Holly, Savannah Two-Lined Spittlebug Damage Tuscaloosa Heuchera Anthracnose (Colletotrichum) Jefferson Hydrangea, Bigleaf Corynespora Leaf Spot Jefferson, Shelby Iris Iris Leaf Spot Jefferson Ivy, English Anthracnose (Colletotrichum) Jefferson(2) Ivy, English Bacterial Leaf Spot (Xanthomonas) Jefferson Lantana Lacebugs Tuscaloosa Maple, Japanese Phyllosticta Leaf Spot Jefferson Maple, Red Gloomy Scale Shelby Oak, Willow Oak Spider Mites Jefferson Periwinkle Pythium Root Rot Tuscaloosa Petunia Phytophthora Blight Jefferson Pittosporium Cottony Cushion Scale Jefferson Privet, Japanese Cercospora Leaf Spot Tuscaloosa Rose Black Spot Jefferson Rose Spider Mites Jefferson Spruce, Dwarf Alberta Spider Mites Jefferson St. Augustinegrass Chinch Bugs Tuscaloosa St. Augustinegrass Gray Leaf Spot Jefferson Sweetgum Cercospora Leaf Spot Jefferson Zinnia Bacterial Leaf Spot (Xanthomonas) Jefferson Zoysiagrass Leaf Rust Shelby *Counties are not reported for greenhouse, nursery, and golf course samples.
AUBURN ENTOMOLOGY REPORT - JULY 2005 (C. Ray) COUNTY CROP CATEGORY SPECIMEN NAME Montgomery Shrubs Ornamental Tiger Beetles Cleburne Gladiolus Ornamental Suspect Mites, Aphids or Thrips Cleburne Lantana Ornamental Lantana Lace Bug Tuscaloosa Oak Ornamental Oak Skeletonizer Damage Houston Cottonwood Ornamental Cottonwood Petiole Gall Houston Hickory Ornamental Ambrosia Beetle Houston Hickory Ornamental Round-Headed Wood Borer Madison Hickory Ornamental Walnut Caterpillar Madison Elm Ornamental Larger Elm Leaf Beetle Larvae Cherokee Hosta Ornamental Fungus Gnat Larvae Jefferson Azalea Ornamental Azalea Lace Bug Damage Tuscaloosa Ilex compacta Ornamental Lantana Scale Houston Amaryllis Bulbs Ornamental Convict Caterpillar Clay Camellia Ornamental Camellia Scale Marengo Sycamore Ornamental Blotch Leaf Miner and Sycamore Lace Bug
UPCOMING EVENTS
September 16-18 2005:
Southern Christmas Tree Association Annual Meeting.
Beavers Christmas Tree Farm
Trafford, Alabama.
For more information go to www.southernchristmastrees.orgSeptember 9-10, 2005:
The Southern Plant Conference.
Louisville, Kentucky.
Contact: Matt Gardiner, KY Coordinator, 502-245-0238: e-mail, matthew624@aol.com; or Betsie Taylor, KNLA Exec. Dir., 350 Village Drive, Frankfort, KY 40601; 502-848-0055 or 800-735-9791, Fax 502-848-0032 e-mail knla@mis.net
URL: http://www.knla.org
or Danny Summers at SNA, 770-953-3311; Fax 770-953-4411; SNA Infoline, 770-953-4636; e-mail, danny@mail.sna.org;
URL: http://www.sna.orgSeptember 24-30, 2005
Alabama Farmers Federation Horticultural Tour.
Niagra Region of Canada
Contact Brian Hardin at 800-392-5705, ext.4217 or bhardin@alfafarmers.orgSeptember 30 - October 1, 2005:
Middle Tennessee Nursery Association Horticultural Trade Show.
McMinnville Civic Center, McMinnville, TN
For more information contact Ann Halcomb by: phone: 931-668-7322; fax: 931-668-9601; e-mail: mtna@blomand.net,
http://www.mtna.com/ or http://www.southeasternnursery.com/mtna/October 3-4, 2005:
North Alabama Middle Tennessee Tour
Hosted by Alabama Nursery and Landscape Association
For more information contact Linda VanDyke at ALNLA: 334-821-5148October 23-26, 2005:
IPPS Southern Region of North America 30th Annual Meeting.
Gainesville, Florida.
For more information click on http://www.ipps.org/SouthernNA/programs.htmlJanuary 5-6, 2006:
Mid-States Horticultural Expo.
Kentucky Fairgrounds, Louisville, Kentucky.
NOTE: Kentucky will host this new winter trade show. The event was created with cooperation from the Kentucky Nursery & Landscape Association, the Tennessee Nursery & Landscape Association, and the Southern Nursery Association. The Kentucky Fairgrounds is a 400-acre facility with more than 1 million square feet of indoor space.February 2-4, 2006:
Gulf States Horticultural Expo.
Mobile Convention Center, Mobile, Alabama.
For more information email: info@gshe.org
Voicemail: 334-502-7777
Fax: 334-502-7711June 21-24, 2006:
South East Greenhouse Conference.
For more information go to www.sgcts.org.August 24-26, 2006:
The Farwest Show.
Portland, Oregon, Oregon Convention Center.
Contact Aimee Schendel, Oregon Association of Nurserymen, 29751 SW Town Center Loop West, Wilsonville, OR 97070; 800-342-6401; 503-682-5089 x 2006; Fax, 503-682-5099; e-mail, info@farwestshow.com
URL: http://www.farwestshow.comOctober 6-7, 2006:
Middle Tennessee Nursery Association Horticultural Trade Show.
McMinnville Civic Center, McMinnville, TN
For more information contact Ann Halcomb by: phone: 931-668-7322; fax: 931-668-9601; e-mail: mtna@blomand.net,
http://www.mtna.com/ or http://www.southeasternnursery.com/mtna/August 23-25, 2007:
The Farwest Show.
Portland, Oregon, Oregon Convention Center.
Contact Aimee Schendel, Oregon Association of Nurserymen, 29751 SW Town Center Loop West, Wilsonville, OR 97070; 800-342-6401, 503-682-5089 x 2006; Fax, 503.682.5099; e-mail, info@farwestshow.com
URL: http://www.farwestshow.comOctober 5-6, 2007:
Middle Tennessee Nursery Association Horticultural Trade Show.
McMinnville Civic Center, McMinnville, TN
For more information contact Ann Halcomb by: phone: 931-668-7322; fax: 931-668-9601; e-mail: mtna@blomand.net,
http://www.mtna.com/ or http://www.southeasternnursery.com/mtna/
Send horticultural questions and comments to ktilt@acesag.auburn.edu.
Send questions and comments to fischbr@auburn.edu.
Letters to Bernice Fischman - 101 Funchess Hall - Auburn University, AL 36849.