Other Projects

(Scroll down for projects)

Projects:

Renesting, nest depredation, and gosling survival of dusky Canada geese on the Copper River Delta, Alaska (completed)

Habitat factors associated with variation in nest success of Dusky Canada Geese on the Copper River Delta, Alaska (completed)

Modeling the recovery rates of avian populations (completed)

Ecology and management of feral hogs on Fort Benning, Georgia (completed)

Evaluation of Triclopyr Amine for controlling alligator weed (Altemanthera philoxeroides) and restoring native plants to wetlands at Eufaula National Wildlife Refuge (completed)

Abundance and habitat use of King Rails in Eufaula National Wildlife Refuge (completed)

Population status and host plant population status of the Gulf Coast solitary bee, Hesperapis oraria

Carbon Sequestration and natural longleaf pine ecosystems

Monitoring of unexploded ordnance (UXO) sampling plots for impacts on forest development and longleaf pine restoration (completed)

 

Renesting, nest depredation, and gosling survival of dusky Canada geese on the Copper River Delta, Alaska (completed)

The Copper River Delta, Alaska (CRD) contains the largest known concentration of breeding dusky Canada geese (Branta canadensis occidentalis).  Elevation and hydrologic changes following the 1964 earthquake resulted in large-scale habitat changes and shifts in the predator community on the area.  Subsequently, populations of this subspecies have declined to their lowest recorded levels since surveys began in the 1970’s.  The current fall population is approximately 10,000 birds.  The management plan for dusky Canada geese requires complete closure of sport hunting for sympatric wintering Canada geese if the population falls below a threshold level of 8,000 birds (Pacific Flyway Council 1996).  Population estimates are based on aerial surveys corrected for visibility using ground-based surveys for nests.  Significant renesting would lower the visibility correction factor and further reduce estimates of the size of the breeding population.  Information on cause specific nest depredation, renesting effort, gosling survival, and adult female survival will be critical to determining why productivity remains low and what management options can reverse the decline.  The objectives of this study are: (1) to determine the timing and extent of renesting by dusky Canada geese in the CRD, (2) to examine the cause-specific rates of nest depredation for duskies in high density nesting areas, (3) to determine the survival rate and causes of mortality for adult females and goslings hatched in high density nesting areas.

Status – Field studies examining the variation in productivity across the Delta were completed in 2003.  Two manuscripts detailing the variability in nest success, renesting effort, and variation in clutch size are in press.

Top of List

Habitat factors associated with variation in nest success of Dusky Canada Geese on the Copper River Delta, Alaska (completed)

 

Funding source (s): USDA Forest Service

 

Principal Investigator (s): Barry Grand

 

Student (s): David Miller

 

Duration: August 2001 – August 2004

 

The decline in dusky Canada goose numbers on the Copper River Delta, Alaska (CRD) coincided with declines in nest success. Apparent nest success for duskies in the CRD was estimated at 88% by Hansen (1961), but had fallen to 43% in the early 1980s and below 10% in the late 1980s. More recent (1997-2000) estimates suggest that nest success in the Alaganik Slough study area varied from 27-35%. These apparent changes in the relative importance of nest predators were correlated with rapid successional changes in the vegetation community subsequent to the 2-3m uplift of the region during the 1964 earthquake. The goal of this project was to examine spatial and temporal variation in productivity of duskies across habitats. The objectives were (1) to identify patterns in spatial and temporal variation in nest success that are related to the abundance and distribution of bald eagles, physical features of the landscape, and vegetative cover types; and (2) to provide a cross-walk to the US Forest Service habitat classification and projection model for habitats on the CRD that could be used to project density and productivity changes in dusky populations.

 

Status – This project was completed in May 2004 and resulted in one M.S. thesis and several manuscripts for publication. In this work we were able to compare alternative mechanistic models of survival that directly related mortality to predator-prey processes. First, we developed estimating models by extending the maximum likelihood estimator for nest survival to incorporate non-linear relationships. Our results support a threespecies interaction, between eagles, goose nests, and eulachon presence determining intra-annual temporal variation in nest survival. When eulachon, an alternative prey for eagles, was present, results supported prey switching by eagles, leading to high nest survival rates for geese. When alternative prey was not available, eagle abundance at study sites largely determined nest survival. The number of nests consumed per eagle was related to the abundance of both eagles and nests. Second, we examined the relationship of predation probability to vegetation near nests and measures of intra- and inter-species interaction. Nest survival was higher during the early season, when predation by eagles was highest, at nest sites on islands and in tall shrub communities. Nest survival also increased as the density of nesting geese increased. Female survival increased as the proportion of low density shrub vegetation increased within 50 m of nests. Results indicate that the ability of geese to detect predators and thus defend nest sites and themselves may be more important than choosing nest sites that limit detection by predators. Future changes in vegetation on the Copper River Delta may further limit nest success for the population.

Top of List

Modeling the recovery rates of avian populations (completed)

At least 29 species of birds are known to use the near shore waters of the Beaufort Sea, which makes them potentially vulnerable to catastrophes resulting from industrial activities associated with offshore oil and gas extraction.  The goals of this project were to identify the available data on vital rates of selected species, determine the best methods available for modeling the recovery of avian populations from catastrophic mortality events and where possible develop the population model structure for target species, and provide natural resource professionals with an easy to use, well-documented tool for examining population level impacts of oil spills.

Status This project has been completed and the final report has been reviewed by USGS and Minerals Management Service.  The software tool and the Access database were reviewed and finalized.  Manuscripts describing the effect of catastrophic perturbation on short term population dynamics, the momentum of populations across vertebrate life histories, and the use of momentum in making population management decisions have been published in Ecological Applications, Ecological Modeling, and the Journal of Wildlife Management.  Additional publications describing the sensitivity of momentum and an innovative method for predicting the sensitivity of animal populations to perturbation or management actions is in preparation.  The final report is in preparation for publication as a monograph.  A workshop describing the modeling tool and database was presented at the North American Duck Symposium in Bismark, North Dakota in September 2006.  More details about the project and the software are available at www.ag.auburn.edu/alcfwru/avsmdl/.

Top of List

Ecology and management of feral hogs on Fort Benning, Georgia (completed)

Funding Source:  U.S. Department of Defense, Fort Benning, Georgia

Principal Investigator:  Stephen S. Ditchkoff (Auburn University), James B. Grand, Mike Mitchell

Students:  Laura Hanson, Buck Jolley, Bill Sparklin

Duration:  September 2003 – May 2007

Self-sustaining populations of feral swine have inhabited Fort Benning, Georgia, since at least the 1950s.  Originating from free-ranging domesticated hogs and European boar (Sus scrofa) introduced for hunting, these populations recently have grown to the point where sightings are common and areas affected by their foraging are extensive.  Because hogs forage by vigorous rooting, they can strongly affect their environment by disturbing soil, impeding regeneration of trees, disrupting understory plant communities, and altering habitat for numerous animal species.  Of particular concern on Fort Benning, evidence is building that hog populations have the potential to strongly affect threatened and endangered animal and plant species such as the gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) and relict trillium (Trillium reliquum).

The goal of this project is to investigate the efficacy of removal for reducing the impact of feral hogs on threatened populations and sensitive habitats on the Fort Benning military installation.  Currently, management of hogs on Fort Benning includes trapping and removal, as well as an open hunting season (over 2,000 hogs were harvested by hunters from 2001 to 2003).  Future management efforts include increasing trapping efforts and broadening hunting opportunities, but the extent to which such efforts will be effective is unknown.  The capacity for growth in a hog population is prodigious.  Feral hogs breed throughout the year, and mature females can produce several litters of up to 16 piglets per year.  The level of mortality needed to offset this potential depends on the size and demographic processes (i.e., annual survival, fertility, population growth rate) of the population, none of which are known.  These processes must be understood before the number of removals needed to meet management goals can be estimated.

Status – We captured and marked approximately 300 feral hogs to facilitate mark-recapture efforts.  These data indicate that feral hog populations are likely more sensitive to juvenile recruitment and survival than adult survival, where effort is normally targeted.  We affixed GPS collars to approximately 35 female hogs, and examined aspects of their spatial ecology.  These data indicate that female-juvenile sounders on the study area exhibit spatial patterns that are strikingly similar to species that are territorial, suggesting that traditional control efforts (shooting and trapping individuals) may not be the most effective approach.  We also collected food habits data from over 200 individuals, and documented that feral pigs consume significant numbers of herpetofauna, and possess the potential to impact sensitive species.

M.S. Theses have been completed by Laura Hanson (2006) and Buck Jolley (2007).  Bill Sparklin will complete his thesis during fall 2007.

 

Top of List

Evaluation of Triclopyr Amine for controlling alligator weed (Altemanthera philoxeroides) and restoring native plants to wetlands at Eufaula National Wildlife Refuge (completed)

Funding Source:  U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Eufaula National Wildlife Refuge, SePRO Corporation

Principal Investigator:  Gary R.  Hepp (Auburn University)

Student:  Shannon Allen

Duration:  August 2003 – August 2006

Eufaula National Wildlife Refuge (ENWR; 4526 ha) is located on the northern segment of Lake Eufaula, an impoundment of the Chattahoochee River.  The primary management objective of ENWR is to provide habitat for waterfowl and other water birds.  Alligator weed is an invasive nonindigenous species that has become a dominant plant in ENWR waterfowl impoundments.  It provides little or no nutritional value and displaces native plants normally used as a food source, thereby degrading habitat quality for migrating waterfowl.  In this study, I am evaluating application rates and application timing of the herbicides triclopyr amine (Renovate®) and imazapyr (Habitat®) for controlling alligator weed and restoring native plants to the waterfowl impoundments at ENWR.

Status – In moist-soil managed wetlands, we tested effects of application rate (high, medium and low) and timing (April and July) of triclopyr amine and imazapyr on controlling alligator weed and restoring native plants.  In the year of treatment, imazapyr controlled alligator weed better than triclopyr amine when applied in April, but both herbicides applied in July were equally effective at controlling alligator weed.  High application rate of herbicides in April controlled alligator weed better than the low application rate, but application rates of herbicides in July did not differ.  In the year of treatment, application of triclopyr amine resulted in greater native plant biomass than imazapyr.  High application rate of herbicides in April resulted in greater native plant biomass in the year of treatment than low application rate, but native plant biomass did not differ between application rates in July.  One year after treatment, high application rate of herbicides resulted in less alligator weed than low application rate, and July application of either herbicide generally controlled alligator weed better than the April application.  Application of imazapyr in July resulted in greater biomass of native plants one year after treatment than either imazapyr or triclopyr amine applied in April.  This study demonstrates that single herbicide applications can be effective at controlling alligator weed and restoring native plants to managed wetlands.

Results were published in the journal Wetlands.

Top of List

Abundance and habitat use of King Rails at Eufaula National Wildlife Refuge (completed)

Funding Source:  U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Principal Investigator:  Gary Hepp (Auburn University)

Student:  Evan Wheeler

Duration:  March 2006 – September 2006

Wetland losses have affected many bird species that depend on these habitats.  Population levels of several species of marsh birds, including rails and bitterns, for example, appear to be declining.  However, little is known about the ecological requirements of these secretive birds, and monitoring programs to determine their continental status are currently lacking.  Many of these marsh birds are listed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service as Birds of Management Concern (BMC).  In fiscal year 2005-2006, the king rail (Rallus elegans) was placed on the focal species list, identifying this as a species in need of immediate attention by the conservation community. In this study, we initiated a survey to determine examine the status of king rail, black rail (Laterallus jamaicensis), least bittern (Ixobrychus exilis), and common moorhen (Gallinula chloropus) at Eufaula National Wildlife Refuge, and describe habitats used by these marsh birds.

Status - Survey points (n= 37) were established in the Bradley, Houston, and Kennedy Units of Eufaula National Wildlife Refuge.  We conducted two complete surveys in each of three months (April, May and June) in 2006.  Marsh bird sampling protocols established by Courtney Conway (USGS, Arizona Coop. Fish and Wildlife Research Unit) were used for the surveys.  Morning surveys were conducted and began 30 min before sunrise and continued for approximately 3 hr. At each survey point, sampling began with a 5 min passive period followed by a 30 sec period in which calls of each species were broadcast.  Call-broadcast surveys have been shown to increase detectability of individual marsh bird species.  Each individual observed or heard during the survey period and estimated distance to the individual from the survey point were recorded.

Black rails and least bitterns were not recorded during the survey period.  Thirty-nine king rails were observed or heard during the surveys.  Only 10% (n = 4) of king rails were detected during the passive portion of the survey.  Seventy-five common moorhens were observed or heard during the surveys, and 29% (n = 22) were detected during the passive portion of the survey.  Incorporating broadcast calls to the survey substantially increased detection of these secretive marsh birds.  Data analysis will continue, and the relationships between vegetation and water depth parameters will be determined. 

A final report was submitted to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

Top of List

Population status and host plant population status of the Gulf Coast solitary bee, Hesperapis oraria

Funding Source:  U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Principal Investigator:  George Folkerts (Auburn University)

Research Assistant:  Katie Glynn

Duration:  March 2006 – March 2007

Hesperapis oraria was described in 1996 (Cane et al. 1996) from specimens ranging from Horn Island off the coast in Jackson County, Mississippi, eastward to St. Andrews State Park in Bay County, Florida.  This species is the only representative of its genus east of the Mississippi River and thus represents a unique geographical disjunct from other species which inhabit the western U.S. and Mexico.  As far as is known the species is restricted to coastal dune habitats and sandy barrier islands.  Coastal Plain honeycomb head (Balduina angustifolia) is thought to be the sole pollen host for this species (Cane et al. 1996).  Although the host plant ranges farther inland and occurs in coastal Georgia and throughout the Florida peninsula, no specimens of the bee have been taken in most areas of the host plant range.  Thus, it is possible that the species is restricted to the area from which it is presently known.  Nests of this species have not been reported in the literature and were not found during previous survey work.  Thus, the conservation significance of many life history parameters of the species cannot be assessed.  Since the last survey for this species was completed in 1995, Cane (1997) reported that ten populations, located during 1993-1994, survived the effects of Hurricane Opal (October 1995) which impacted essentially the entire known range of the species to some extent.  Since that time, tropical storms or hurricanes have impacted portions of the known range of Hesperapis oraria. An additional factor that may have affected populations of H. oraria relates to the accelerated coastal development that has occurred throughout its range since the bee was discovered. In areas such as the Fort Morgan peninsula in Baldwin County, Alabama, development has markedly changed habitats in the last decade. Cane (1997) reported that a site from which the species was known at Romar Beach, Baldwin County, Alabama, had been destroyed by building construction.

Status – Visits to sites where the bee has been found or could be present were made August 18, 2007 – October 26, 2007.  Because a few bees were seen on October 26, a final visit was made on November 3, 2007.  No bees were seen on that visit.  As far as is presently known, the only pollen host of Hesperapis oraria is the asteraceous plant Balduina angustifolia.  Pollen loads examined from two bees captured on October 6, 2007 revealed only pollen from the known host plant.  During the 2007 active season of the bee, the pollen host was far more abundant at all sites visited than it was during the 2006 season.

Top of List

Carbon sequestration and natural longleaf pine ecosystems

Funding Source:  U.S. Geological Survey, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Principal Investigator:  John Kush (Auburn University)

Graduate Student(s):  Ram Thapa, John Gilbert, William Whitaker

Student Technicians:  Anshu Shrestha, Arpi Shrstha

Duration:  July 2003 – September 2008

Forested ecosystems have a significant potential for sequestering large amounts of carbon through land management.  To fully realize the potential carbon sequestration capabilities of these ecosystems there is a need to develop strategies and methods for increasing carbon sequestration.  A fire-maintained, longleaf pine dominated ecosystem may offer one of the best options for carbon sequestration among the forested ecosystems of the southeastern US while providing habitat for a number of threatened and endangered plant and wildlife species, including red-cockaded woodpeckers, gopher tortoises, indigo snakes, etc … (Hardin and White 1989, Landers et al. 1995, Jackson 1989).  Among the southern pines, longleaf may offer the best opportunity for carbon sequestration.  It is the longest-living of the southern pines, capable of growing to 500 years (Platt et al.  1988). It will continue to put on growth, even at older ages (West et al.  1993).  Products from longleaf pine will sequester carbon longer than most since they are likely to be solid wood products like structural lumber and poles.  In addition to the tree itself, a fire-maintained longleaf pine ecosystem supports a productive understory of grasses and herbaceous plants which themselves may offer more carbon storage than the trees.  Objectives of the study are: Phase I – Develop a detailed literature review/bibliography of research literature related to longleaf pine, above and below ground biomass, and carbon sequestration; Phase II – Determine the relationships between prescribe fire treatment and above/below ground biomass and carbon sequestration; Phase III – Determine the relationships between root biomass/carbon sequestration and the density, site quality, and age of the longleaf pine overstory.

Status – The season of burn study plots on the Escambia Experimental Forest in Brewton, AL have been extensively sampled to address the status of carbon in the no-burn, spring, summer and winter season prescribed burn plots.  Longleaf pine heights and diameters were measured.  Longleaf pine biomass was calculated from these measurements using developed weight and volume equations.  Herbaceous (forbs and grasses) and woody (tree and vine) vegetation and litter were collected from each plot.  The vegetation and litter was oven-dried and weighed.  A sub-sample of the dried vegetation from each component from each plot was ground up and analyzed for carbon.  The resulting percent carbon was used to calculate the carbon sequestered in each component.  The preliminary results were presented at a meeting in early 2005.  Work was completed for the soil samples and the vegetation and soils data is being used by Ram Thapa for his master’s degree.  Because the laboratory analyses have come in under budget, a second year of soils samples have been collected for analyses.  These data will be included in Ram Thapa's master's thesis.   William Whitaker has started on a Master's degree working on Phase III of this project.

Top of List

Monitoring of unexploded ordnance (UXO) sampling plots for impacts on forest development and longleaf pine restoration (completed)

Funding Source:  U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Principal Investigator:  John Kush (Auburn University)

Graduate Student: John Gilbert

Student Technicians:  Anshu Shrestha, Arpi Shrestha

Duration:  September 2004 – December 2006

Mountain longleaf pine (Pinus palustris Mill.) forests are a critically endangered component of the once vast longleaf pine forests of the Southeast.  Stretching from coastal Virginia to the piney woods of east Texas, the longleaf pine forest has dwindled in acreage and integrity.  Several small pockets of this once vast forest remain in the Coastal Plain, but in the mountain region only a small National Wildlife Refuge in northeastern Alabama contains a forest that approaches the landscape witnessed by European settlers – Mountain Longleaf National Wildlife Refuge (MLNWR).  Several years of extensive field and laboratory work on what was once Fort McClellan indicates that the new MLNWR holds a significant acreage of mountain longleaf pine forest, at least 12 old-growth tracts, lush herbaceous communities, and several management predicaments.  These results strengthen the previous contentions that MLNWR contains the finest extant of mountain longleaf pine.  MLNWR’s longleaf pine forests provide the “missing link” to scientists, land managers, and conservationists in the mountain region, providing the only information on 1) age and stand structure and dynamics of frequently burned old-growth forests, 2) composition of pristine plant communities, and 3) landscape extent of mountain longleaf pine forests.

Most longleaf pine forests on the refuge are adversely impacted by hardwood encroachment resulting from lack of fire.  While the reintroduction of prescribed fire will benefit these forests, many areas have evolved beyond the point in which fire alone can restore the forest.  These lands require hardwood/mid-story control along with fire.  By implementing a monitoring program in various forest types the overall effects of this remediation approach can be measured.  It also may be possible to recommend slight modifications to the current methodology that would improve and add benefits to future forest structure.

Status – The sample of UXO plots on the MLNWR on what are considered longleaf pine sites, southerly aspects, indicates that there is a considerable amount of longleaf pine in the overstory.  There were very few longleaf pine seedlings observed on the UXO plots.  The major concern for the MLNWR should be the lack of longleaf pine regeneration.  The minimal basal area of longleaf pine for natural regeneration is 30 square feet/acre.  Less than one-half of the UXO plots have an adequate stocking of longleaf pine to accomplish that. The further loss of longleaf pine in the overstory across MLNWR would make natural regeneration of longleaf pine impossible at the stand level.  The only way to get regeneration would be artificial regeneration.  Based on the work being done with UXO, it does not seem plausible to plant longleaf pine on the Refuge.

Top of List