Effects of Forest Management on Wildlife Species

(Scroll down for projects)

Approximately 70% of non-urban land in Alabama is forested, much of it managed intensively for the production of forest products. Wildlife, both game and nongame species, can be valuable components of forestlands. However, in some forests wildlife may be quite scarce. The abundance of wildlife in woodlands depends upon available food and cover resources that are in turn determined by forest management practices. Timber management can have major impacts on wildlife populations, and information is required to enable adequate evaluation of these impacts and to permit provision for support of wildlife species in the timber program. Many questions need to be answered relative to the relationships between wildlife species or groups and timber management practices. The response of wildlife to such factors as rotation schedule, species composition of forests, burning and thinning schedules, snag retention or removal, and size of clear cuts, needs to be determined. Area sensitive species need to be identified and their area requirements determined. Response of wildlife species to reforestation efforts requires evaluation. Wildlife is of high economic and aesthetic value and represents an important component of our forest ecosystem. It is important that we obtain the necessary information to ensure the retention of wildlife populations as forest management intensifies.

Projects:

Ecology and management of black bears in the Southern Appalachians: responses of bears to forest management

Changes to small mammal populations as a consequence of fuel reduction treatments in longleaf pine ecosystems

Changes to avifaunal populations as a consequence of fuel reduction treatments in Longleaf Pine ecosystem

Effects of growing season prescribed fire on productivity and survival of northern bobwhite populations (complete)

Mapping the distribution of longleaf ecosystems for herpetofauna conservation (new)

Ecological assessment of habitats occupied by breeding birds at Redstone Arsenal, Alabama (new)

Ecology and management of black bears in the Southern Appalachians: responses of bears to forest management

The objectives of this project are: (1) to use field sampling and GIS to develop and evaluate fine-grain habitat maps for each year of research on black bears (Ursus americanus) in the PBS 1981-1999, (2) to analyze field data collected in timber harvests, model changes in habitat associated with harvests and building of roads, and assess responses of bears to these changes, and (3) to employ population and home range models to predict and evaluate demographic and behavioral responses of bears to changes in habitat.  Work to date has resulted in spatial and temporal depictions of habitat quality and food resources for the PBS from 1981 to 1994.  For these years we have also evaluated patterns in survivorship, use of space, and relationships between home ranges and habitat quality for the bear population.  We have developed and tested spatially explicit, individual-based models of optimal home range selection that indicate a strong relationship between the size and shape of home ranges and the spatial distribution of food resources in the sanctuary.

StatusField work on this project ended in 2002 and Melissa and Lara have been processing and analyzing data since.  Lara successfully defended her Masters research in September 2004.  Her work evaluated demography of the Pisgah bear population over a 22- year period.  She was able to model vital rates (population growth rate, survival, and reproduction) for the population and show changes in the rates over time.  During a period when poaching pressure was high, the population suffered high adult mortality and declined.  Following a law enforcement operation adult survival increased, as did population growth rate.  Recent evidence suggests, however, that survival and population growth are again declining, although the cause is not known.  Lara was able to demonstrate the population growth for the bears was most sensitive to adult survival, refuting previous work that found juvenile survival to be most important.  As a side project, Lara also found that baited trapping biased results of a bait station index conducted in the vicinity of trap sites.  Two manuscripts from her work have been published in peer-reviewed journals, a third is in work.  Melissa successfully completed her prelims in summer 2004 and continues her work linking habitat quality to demography for bears, and landscape-scale effects of forest management on their habitat.  She has submitted 2 manuscripts to peer-reviewed journals and has 4 other manuscripts and 1 book chapter in work.  Manuscripts published from this project to date include 1 book chapter, presentation and test of a habitat suitability index (HSI) for black bears in the Wildlife Society Bulletin, an evaluation of the response of black bears to forest management in the Journal of Wildlife Management, and a presentation of optimal home range models in Ecological Modeling.

Top of List

Changes to small mammal populations as a consequence of fuel reduction treatments in longleaf pine ecosystems  

After decades of fire suppression, a need exists for safe methods of returning fire-dependent forest ecosystems to a natural condition and reducing the risk of catastrophic and costly wildfires, particularly for systems near human population centers that have unnaturally high fuel loads.  Little is known about the response of animal communities in fire-dependent forests to burning, or whether alternatives to fire can satisfactorily emulate the positive effects of fire on these communities.  This uncertainty has led to a nation-wide study sponsored by the USDA Forest Service addressing the effects of fire reintroduction and alternatives in fire-dependent ecosystems throughout the United States.  Our portion of this project focuses on the longleaf pine (Pinus palustris) ecosystem, once the largest fire-dependent forest system in North America.  The field site is located at the Solon Dixon Forestry Education Center near Andalusia, Alabama.  Fifteen stands have been selected for this study and divided equally among 5 treatments (control, fire, fire and thin, thin only, and herbicide) to be sampled over the next 3 years.  Following pre-treatment sampling, each stand will be manipulated according to its treatment and responses of vegetation, birds, small mammals, reptiles, amphibians, and insects will be monitored over time. 

Status – Fieldwork on Phase II of this project began in 2002; the fourth season of fieldwork was completed in 2004.  Stand treatments were applied between the 2001 (pre-treatment) and 2002 (post-treatment) summer field seasons except for herbicides which were applied after the 2002 field season.  Trapping for small mammals was performed during summer and winter field seasons of each year.  To provide baseline information on small mammals native to longleaf ecosystems, trapping was also conducted in Conecuh National Forest using the same schedules and protocols.  The small mammal communities sampled in the experimental stands appear to be simple, consisting largely of cotton mice (Peromyscus gossypinus) with smaller numbers of golden mice (Ochrotomys nuttalli).  Nick’s work with the mark/recapture data he collected has shown that stand-scale treatments did affect small communities somewhat; cotton mouse abundance increased, golden mouse abundance decreased on sites that were treated with a combination of burning and understory clearance (i.e., thinning, herbicide).  This effect on small mammal communities was relatively unimportant, however, compared to landscape-scale effects, with distance to nearest source populations having the strongest influence on the population dynamics observed.  Nick successfully defended his MS thesis this past year and is currently preparing 2 manuscripts for submission to peer-reviewed journals.  He also presented results of his work at the annual meeting of The Wildlife Society.

 

Top of List

Changes to avifaunal populations as a consequence of fuel reduction treatments in Longleaf Pine ecosystem

This study is the companion to the small mammal project described above.  The objective of this research is to evaluate the responses of bird populations breeding in the longleaf pine communities to fire and fire alternatives.  Results form this work should provide insights into bird communities that inhabit longleaf forest, how they respond to fire, and whether alternatives to fire can reduce fuel loads while still providing adequate habitat.  The study consists of two parts: 1) assess the diversity and abundance of birds responding to the treatments using point count censuses, and 2) assess demographic responses of birds to treatments through monitoring nest productivity (number of young fledged per nest initiated) and density (through spot-mapping of bird territories) of nesting birds.

Status – Field work has been completed on this project.  From 1 April to 1 July 2004, over 60 bird species were detected by spot-mapping and 155 nests from 25 species were found.  We completed 3 rounds of point counts in all stands, generating more than 5,000 observations of birds.  We found a high number of nests for two species (eastern towhee Pipilo erythrophthalmus, n = 30, Northern Cardinal, Cardinalis cardinalis, n = 41).  Other nests found were from a variety of species including mourning dove, Zenaida macroura, Carolina wren, Thryothorus ludovicianus, pine warbler, Dendroica pinus, and indigo bunting, Passerina cyanea.  Two of the 3 stands that were thinned and burned in 2002 and 2003 had Bachman’s sparrows (Aimophila aestivalis) appear briefly, but none stayed to breed.  This threatened species was absent prior to treatments due to dense shrubby understory.  Three nests were parasitized by brown-headed cowbirds (Molothrus ater) again in 2004 compared with 3 in 2003 and only one in 2002.  Overall, daily survival rate (DSR) was similar to previous years, at 0.42.  Further analyses will investigate Mayfield DSR for each treatment and determine its influence on breeding success.  Further data analyses are currently underway.

 

Top of List

Effects of growing season prescribed fire on productivity and survival of northern bobwhite populations (completed)

Over the last 3 decades northern bobwhite (Colinus virginianus, hereafter bobwhite) populations have declined precipitously throughout the Southeastern and Midwestern United States.  In the southeast, forested lands offer some of the best opportunities for bobwhite management.  In stands of pine and mixed pine-hardwoods with low (<50%) canopy cover, frequent (1-3yr) controlled fires can be used to maintain the early successional, mainly herbaceous, understory vegetation required by breeding bobwhites.  This habitat is typified by the "native" stands of longleaf pine (Pinus palustris) described by early explorers.  Traditionally, prescribed fire has been applied during the winter months to reduce damage to desirable plant and animal populations.  However, there is increasing support for the use of prescribed fire in longleaf pine forests during the growing season, because it may mimic the natural occurrence of lightning-caused wildfires and may favor the native condition of longleaf pine ecosystem preferred by some characteristic threatened and endangered species.  This approach to forest ecosystem management may have adverse effects on populations of ground nesting birds including bobwhites, which may suffer nest losses and mortality when fire occurs during the growing season.  The objective of this research is to determine the effects of controlled growing season fires on the productivity, survival, and growth rate of bobwhite populations in the longleaf pine ecosystem. 

Status–The final field season was completed in September 2004.  In total, 374 bobwhites were radio-marked and approximately 21,000 locations were collected for these individuals over the 2 and one-half year duration of the project.  Analyses of survival, movement, and female success of bobwhites were completed.  Age-based periodic population models were developed to represent summer and winter seasons for bobwhite populations in Wisconsin and Alabama, the latitudinal extent of their range.  Prospective and retrospective analyses were conducted to evaluate the functional and observed relationship of vital rates to population growth rate within each population.  Additionally, retrospective analyses were used to evaluate the influence that latitude had on population dynamics of bobwhites in Wisconsin and Alabama.  The results are presented in Travis Folk's Ph.D. dissertation.  Manuscripts detailing these results as well as novel methods for analyzing periodic matrix models and appropriate uses of bobwhite telemetry data have been accepted for publication in Wildlife Society Bulletin, Journal of Wildlife Management, Journal of Animal Ecology, and Auk.

 

Top of List

Mapping the distribution of longleaf ecosystems for herpetofauna conservation (new)

Funding Source:  U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Principal Investigator:        James B. Grand

Co-principal Investigator:  Mark MacKenzie (Auburn University)

Research Assistant: Kevin Kleiner

Duration:  August 2007 – August 2010

Over the last two centuries, the longleaf pine ecosystem has been dramatically altered by logging, replanting with other pine species, and fire suppression.  Current estimates, suggest that longleaf occupies 5% of its pre-European settlement extent.  This reduction in habitat has affected numerous birds, reptiles, and amphibians.  The best known example of this is the red-cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis), a federally endangered species that inhabits old growth longleaf pine woodlands.  A reduction in the amount of habitat available to this species has led to corresponding reductions in population size.

The gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) and the black pine snake (Pituophis melanoleucus lodingi) are also longleaf ecosystem inhabitants whose abundance is in decline.  Successful management of both the gopher tortoise and the black pine snake requires knowledge of the current distribution of the longleaf pine ecosystem.  Currently, the course scale spatial distribution of longleaf pine can be obtained from the USDA Forest Service’s Forest Inventory and Analysis Program (FIA, Prasad and Iverson 2003). While useful for visualizing where longleaf exists and perhaps planning at a regional scale, this product is not of sufficient resolution for site specific wildlife conservation and management. Another source that has the potential to provide the spatial distribution of longleaf pine is remote sensing.  In 2005, John Hogland, a graduate student at Auburn University working with the Alabama Gap Analysis Project, created a fine-grain (30 meter) probability distribution of longleaf pine ecosystems (Hogland 2005).  Currently, this is the only large extent, fine grain map of the current distribution of the longleaf pine ecosystem.  The goal of this project is to assess what is mapped and what can be improved in the Hogland Longleaf Pine Ecosystem Map for the purpose of enhancing the ability to manage and conserve the gopher tortoise and black pine snake.  Additionally, we intend to relate gopher tortoise burrow density to the improved predicted probability map.

Status - We have begun the process of collecting additional data for map assessment and potential improvement.  Recently acquired data includes Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) plot data in Alabama and Florida, Mississippi Institute for Forest Inventory (MIFI) plot data, and U.S. Forest Service Continuous Inventory of Stand Condition (CISC) data.  Additionally, an existing crosswalk of the Soil Survey Geographic Database (SSURGO) soil classes to a longleaf suitability index has been identified and we are currently planning to assemble the individual county soil maps and stratify by this layer in any subsequent image classification

 

Top of List

Ecological assessment of habitats occupied by breeding birds at Redstone Arsenal, Alabama (new)

Funding Source:  Department of Defense

Principal Investigator:  Troy Best (Auburn University)

Graduate Students:  Lisa A. McWilliams and Charles A. Kilgore

Duration:  April 2007 – December 2008

The state of Alabama has one of the richest faunal biodiversities in the United States (Mirarchi 2004).  There are 420 species of birds comprising the official American Ornithological Society state list (Mirarchi 2004).  This is almost half the total species recognized for the continental United States by the American Birding Association. 

Redstone Arsenal encompasses a variety of habitats within its 38,248 secured acres.  It contains extensive wetland areas associated with the Tennessee River, several local springs, woodlands, and fields.  The varied habitats attract a large percentage (~290 species) of Alabama’s avifauna either as residents, migrants, or rare visitors (Porter 2001).  The area’s variable water levels of ponds, sinks, and cypress swamps, much of which is maintained by the Wheeler National Wildlife Refuge, attract many winter waterfowl, herons, egrets, and shorebirds (Porter 2001).  The Redstone Arsenal area also attracts many raptors and passerines of both woodland and field species.  

Twenty-eight species of birds are of special concern in Alabama.  Many species of these birds of special concern may occur in the Redstone Arsenal area of the Tennessee Valley region.  Alabama provides critical breeding, wintering, or migratory habitats necessary for the overall success of these species. 

Considering the need for information on avian diversity and ecological associations in the region, an assessment of species present, distribution, breeding activity, habitats occupied, etc., is highly desirable.  These data would be useful in developing management plans for the Redstone Arsenal, and would provide baseline data for comparisons and future research.  This study will be a significant contribution to overall assessment of presence, distribution, breeding activities, and habitat associations of avian species of special concern in Alabama.

 

Status – Preliminary data on occurrence of birds at Redstone Arsenal were gathered during 2006 and 2007 incidental to research on bats.  These data formed the basis for a preliminary report submitted to Redstone Arsenal in September 2007.  During January-August 2008, field work will be conducted at Redstone Arsenal to assess species present, distribution on the facility, breeding activity, and habitats occupied.  A final report will be submitted by 31 December 2008.