Abstract

A Simple Ultrasound Instrument is an Effective Tool in Predicting Body Composition of Live Pigs.

Lee I. Chiba

Background Information & Objective

Assessing the body composition of live pigs is important in making selection and marketing decisions and in studying nutrition, physiology or growth of pigs. The use of the ultrasound technology to estimate in vivo body composition of animals has a long history. At present, numerous ultrasound instruments with varying complexity are available, but there seem to be considerable variations among complex, real-time ultrasound instruments in the efficacy of estimating body composition. The use of complex ultrasound instruments can be justified only if their additional costs of instruments and operation are more than offset by benefits in extra precision. Data collected from pigs that had been used in several nutrition experiments were used for regression analyses to evaluate the efficacy of a simple ultrasound instrument capable of measuring only backfat (BF).

Source of Data, Procedures, Results & Summary

Data collected from 177 crossbred gilts (n = 88) and castrated males (n = 89) were used to describe the relationship between ultrasound BF measurements and(or) other independent variables and carcass traits and lean in market weight pigs. Pigs were housed either individually (n = 69) or as a group (six per pen; n = 108) and were fed diets containing diverse levels of amino acid (4.75 to 11.20 g lysine/kg) from 20 kg to market weight (91 to 124 kg). When pigs approached market weight, BF thicknesses were measured 4 to 5 cm from the midline at the third rib, last rib and last lumbar vertebra using a simple, digital readout ultrasound instrument (Renco Lean-Meater). After slaughter, carcass BF were measured at the midline of corresponding positions. In addition, other standard carcass measurements were collected, and carcass specific gravity was determined by hydrostatic weighing of the right side. The age of pigs at the time of slaughter was also recorded. Appropriate statistical analyses were conducted to describe the relationship among variables and to develop multiple regressions. The best equations were chosen based on R2, standard error of estimate and P-value for the regression coefficient and standard deviation for the regression model (Sy.x). All regressions were developed within sex, and for the combined data set. The ultrasound instrument seemed to underestimate carcass BF, which agrees with previously published reports. Differences in the anatomical location of measurements and(or) changes in fat tissues during the chilling process may partly explain those differences between ultrasound and carcass BF. The average ultrasound BF was highly correlated with carcass BF (r = .82) and percentage of carcass lean (r = -.79), but only modestly with weight of lean (r = -.32). The equations based on ultrasound BF and live measurements accounted for 78 to 83% of variation in predicting average carcass BF and weight of lean in gilts and castrated males. Similarly, the equations based on live measurements accounted for 80 and 79% of variation in predicting carcass BF and weight of lean, respectively, in the combined data set. Regression analyses for the 10th rib BF resulted in similar R2 value (.79), but the Sy.x was higher than that obtained for the average BF. For the percentage of lean, prediction models had slightly lower R2 (.73), and the Sy.x was 1.44% for the combined data set.

In summary, partial correlations between ultrasound measurements obtained by using a simple instrument and actual carcass traits in the present research were very similar to those reported for the real-time ultrasound instruments. The precision for the prediction equations for carcass BF or weight of lean, likewise, seemed to be equal to or better than those reported. Measuring BF with an instrument used in this research is very simple because of its size, weight and simplicity of operation. Although neither a contemporary comparison of different instruments nor actual dissection of carcass to estimate lean was made in this research, the results indicate that the use of a simple ultrasound instrument is a practical and effective means to estimate carcass traits and composition of live pigs in studies of nutrition, physiology or growth, or in making selection and(or) marketing decisions.

Built: 4/10/96

 

Copyright © 2000-2006
Department of Animal Sciences at Auburn University
Contact: webmaster@ansci.auburn.edu