Abstract

Hydrolyzed Feather Meal as a Source of Amino Acids for Finisher Pigs.

Lee I. Chiba, Henry W. Ivey, Keith A. Cummins, and Brian E. Gamble

Background Information & Objectives The competition between humans and pigs for quality sources of protein is likely to increase continuously because of the ever-increasing world population. The effort to find viable alternative protein sources for pigs is, therefore, important for successful swine production in the future. Hydrolyzed feather meal (FM) has been of interest in nutrition research because of its high protein content, but it is deficient in some amino acids, especially lysine. Because the adequacy of lysine is the primary concern for most swine diets, it is generally recommended that the use of FM should be limited to about 5% of the diet for optimum performance. However, previous research indicated that finisher pigs may be able to utilize higher levels of FM than those commonly recommended. The research described herein was conducted to evaluate the value of FM as a source of dietary amino acids for finisher pigs, and to determine the possibility of replacing soybean meal (SBM) completely with FM by lysine supplementation.

Experimental Procedures, Results & Conclusions

To determine the optimum level of dietary FM, five iso-lysinic (7.3 g/kg) SBM diets were formulated to contain 0, 30, 60, 90 or 120 g FM/kg. Two additional diets containing 90 g FM kg-1 were used to investigate the possibility of replacing SBM completely with FM. The FM diets were formulated to be iso-nitrogenous to the SBM diet containing 0 g FM/kg, and L-lysineùHCl was added to one of the two diets to achieve 7.3 g lysine/kg. All indispensable amino acid contents of this diet were at least 20.8% greater than the current NRC recommendations. To avoid possible confounding effects of dietary energy density, dried fat product was used to achieve similar energy contents of all diets (3.45 Mcal DE/kg). At an average weight of 67.5 +/- 3.4 kg, 21 gilts and 21 castrated males were randomly assigned within sex to seven dietary treatments. Pigs were housed individually, and allowed ad libitum access to feed and water. All pigs were slaughtered at an average weight of 100.4 +/- 3.2 kg to assess carcass traits. The rate (linear, P < .05; cubic, P = .09) and efficiency of weight gain (linear, P = .07) decreased as dietary FM increased. However, the response of pigs to the initial increment of FM (30 g/kg) in weight gain and greater feed intake of pigs fed the diet containing 120 g FM kg-1 seemed to be responsible for overall decreases in these criteria. The rate and efficiency of weight gain in pigs fed other SBM diets containing FM were similar. Although there were no statistically significant trends among pigs fed the SBM diets, the inclusion of 120 g FM/kg seemed to result in the inferior carcass quality as indicated by consistently lower values for carcass specific gravity (1.040 vs 1.045), proportion of carcass lean (48.7 vs 51.6%) and the rate of lean accretion (236.4 vs 301.4 g d-1). Pigs fed the two FM diets (with and without lysine supplementation) grew slower than those fed the SBM diet containing 0 (P < .01) or 90 g FM/kg (P = .06). Similar results were obtained for the efficiency of weight gain (P < .05) and rate and efficiency of lean accretion (P < .05). There was no effect of lysine supplementation on the rate and efficiency of weight gain. Pigs fed the FM diet supplemented with lysine, however, had less 10th rib backfat (P = .10), larger longissimus muscle area (P = .08), greater proportion of carcass lean (P < .05), and higher rate (P = .08) and efficiency of lean accretion (P < .05) than those fed the FM diet without lysine supplementation.

The results indicate that FM up to 90 g/kg may be incorporated in the diet without adversely affecting carcass traits of finisher pigs. In addition, although weight gain may be reduced, FM can be used as the only source of protein supplement without decreasing the carcass quality, provided that the diet is supplemented with crystalline lysine to alleviate its deficiency.

Built: 4/10/96

 

Copyright © 2000-2006
Department of Animal Sciences at Auburn University
Contact: webmaster@ansci.auburn.edu