PRELIMINARY DATA: Crossville
				Kathy Glass, Variety Testing, Auburn University
				Robert Dawkins, Supt., Sand Mtn.
				Dale Monks, Extension Agronomist, AU
				Dennis Delaney, Extension Spec. III, AU
				2002 Crossville Regular Soybean
				Variety	Mean Yield
					(bu/acre)
MG IV		1		Delta King 4763RR	49.3
		2		Delta King 4868RR	43.1
		3		SS RT 5001N	42.5
MV V		1		Pioneer 95B42	45.4
		2		Deltapine DP 5414RR	43.7
		3		Armor 53-K3	43.0
		4		Armor 52-C2	42.4
		5		Pioneer 95B32	41.8
		6		Delta King 5465RR	40.8
		7		USG Exp 570	39.6
		8		USG 540NRR	39.4
		9		SS RT 5302N	38.5
		10		Pioneer 95B43	38.5
		11		SS RT 557N	38.3
		12		Croplan Genetics RC 5252	38.3
		13		ES Prairie RRI	38.2
		14		Dyna-Gro 3562NRR	38.0
		15		USG 510nRR	37.2
		16		Armor 54-Z4	37.2
		17		Hutcheson	37.1
		18		Delta King 5366RR	36.8
		19		Croplan Genetics RC 5454	36.1
		20		USG 7582nRR	35.8
		21		Croplan Genetics RC 5332	35.7
		22		Pioneer 95B96	35.4
		23		SS RT 5702N	35.3
		24		Delta King 5668RR	35.3
		25		Deltapine DP 5806 RR	35.2
		26		Armor 56-J6	34.9
		27		USG 7547RR	34.8
		28		AgriPro/Garst 5512 RR/N	34.8
		29		Deltapine DPX5734RR	34.1
		30		Delta King 5661RR	33.3
		31		ES Ranger RR	33.0
		32		SS RT-5999N	32.9
		33		Deltapine DPX 5915RR	32.6
		34		ES Punch RR	32.5
		35		Croplan Genetics RC 5892	29.1
		36		ES Marshall RR	28.3
		37		ES Trooper RR	27.6
		38		Delta King 5961 RR	25.6
MG VI		1		Musen	34.5
		2		SS RT 6202	34.0
		3		USG 7662nRR	33.3
		4		Croplan Genetics RC 6767	32.1
		5		GARST 6112RR/N	31.4
		6		USG 620NRR	31.3
		7		Dyna-Gro 3614NRR	30.3
		8		Croplan Genetics RC 6262	30.1
				These data are preliminary and are subject to change with the final
				report.  This report will be available through the Alabama
				Experiment Station later this winter.  Producers should consider as
				many sources as possible when making cultivar selections.