S-1000 Regional Project
Animal Manure and Waste Utilization, Treatment and Nuisance Avoidance for a Sustainable Agriculture
2003 Station Reports


2003 Annual Report, S-1000
North Carolina State University

Reporting Scientists:    Philip W. Westerman1
                                       Jiayang (Jay) Cheng1
                                       John J. Classen1
                                       Theo van Kempen2

Location:  North Carolina State University
                1Dept. of Biological and Agricultural Engineering
                2Dept. of Animal Science
                Raleigh, NC   27695-7625

Progress to Date (by objective):

Obj. 2, Task 1 — Engineered Biological Treatment Processes

Ekokan Upflow Biofiltration Treatment System
Several technology evaluations have been conducted or are being conducted in North Carolina with swine manure under an agreement between Smithfield Foods, Inc. and the North Carolina Attorney General.  Ekokan Biofiltration Treatment System was one of the projects selected for demonstration and evaluation in North Carolina based in part on previous success with a pilot scale evaluation at a North Carolina State University research farm.  The full-scale system was constructed in 2002 and acclimation of the system with diluted lagoon liquid began August 14, 2002. The Ekokan ® LLC waste treatment system consists of solids/liquid separation and biofiltration of the liquid with upflow aerated biological filters.  Five finishing barns (about 4,000 finishing pigs total) are connected to the waste treatment system, and the barn pits are emptied automatically in sequence, supplying usually six flushes per day. Flushed waste flows through a solids-liquid separator and then is pumped to an equalization tank.  Liquid flows from the equalization tank by gravity and passes through first-stage and second-stage aerated biofilters connected in series (two sets, or four biofilters in total), with each biofilter having 130 m3 of plastic media in a 151 m3  (40,000 gal.) tank.  The biofilter tanks are covered, and the air and foam given off from the aerated treatment are routed through PVC pipes to exit points over an anaerobic lagoon.  The time for liquid to flow through the two biofilters is less than 24 hours. Two 45 kW (60 hp) blowers provide the air.  Biofilters are backwashed periodically to remove excess biosolids.   Data showed 90% or more TAN reduction during May-June, 2003.  Nitrification improved with warmer weather, but some nitrite remained in output in June.  During May-June, 2003 most of the nitrification occurred in the first stage biofilters.  The operation of the treatment system was ended June 30, 2003 due to lack of operating funds. 

International Ecological Systems and Services (IESS) Biokinetic Air Systems Waste Treatment System for Wastewater (Westerman)
The IESS, Inc. aeration pond treatment system was monitored from Nov. 2000 through December 2002.   The system was installed on a commercial hog farm for treating 190 m3/d (50,000 gal./d) of liquid from a swine anaerobic lagoon.  Objectives of the treatment system are to reduce amount of nitrogen that has to be land applied, improve flush water quality and check for improvements in environment inside the barns that may be reflected in ammonia levels, and determine the changes in the anaerobic lagoon due to treating 50,000 gal./day. The aeration pond was divided into two sections by a hanging curtain. Diffused air was supplied by a 30 Hp blower and slitted polyethylene pipe laid across the pond bottom.  Depth of liquid was maintained at about 3 m (9-10 ft.).  Effluent from the aeration pond has low odor, usually low total ammonia nitrogen, variable amount of nitrate/nitrite nitrogen, and lower concentrations of phosphorus (40 % lower), and copper and zinc (80 % lower) compared to the anaerobic lagoon.  Treated effluent was recycled to flush two finishing barns (720 pigs each) out of nine that empty into the anaerobic lagoon. The nitrate that is formed in the aeration pond is denitrified to nitrogen gas when the liquid flushes the barns and goes to the anaerobic lagoon. Results for 24 mo. of operation have been reported in a conference paper. 

Phosphorus Removal by Struvite Crystallization (Westerman)
    A struvite crystallizer has been developed as a possible practical process for removing phosphorus from hog waste anaerobic lagoon liquid.  This process could become useful for farmers needing to remove phosphorus from effluent that is applied to land because of likely regulation of phosphorus nutrient management. Based on the success of a lab-scale crystallizer, a field-scale continuous crystallizer was designed, built and tested with lagoon liquid at flow rates of 351 L/h and 568 L/h.  Removal of total phosphorus, including both dissolved and suspended phosphorus, reached 80-90% in the field system.  This degree of removal implies that the system may be useful at commercial livestock operations where phosphorus content of the waste water needs to be significantly reduced.  A patent application has been submitted for the process.

Obj. 2, Task 2 -- Aquaculture Based Treatment

Nutrient Removal from Anaerobically Treated Swine Wastewater by Growing Duckweed (Cheng)
    Organics destruction and nutrient uptake in an integrated pilot system of anaerobic digestion and duckweed nutrient removal for swine wastewater treatment were monitored under field conditions. Raw swine wastewater of 100 gallons/day was first treated in a 1,000-gallon anaerobic digester with floating ballast rings. Organic compounds in the wastewater were digested to produce biogas.  Many nutrients including nitrogen and phosphorus remain in the effluent of the anaerobic digester. Duckweed (Lemna gibba 8678) was grown in three 1,000-gallon tanks to recover nutrients from the anaerobic effluent. The duckweed was periodically harvested and can be used as animal, poultry, and fish feed. This research provides an initial understanding of the attached-growth anaerobic digester and the characteristics exhibited by Lemna gibba in the treatment of swine wastewater under conditions similar to those found in North Carolina.  Both the anaerobic digester and the duckweed tanks were run as completely mixed systems. The performance of the system was monitored by measuring chemical oxygen demand (COD), total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN), ammonia nitrogen, total phosphorus (TP), ortho-phosphate-phosphorus, and pH in the influent and effluent of each treatment unit. The treatment achieved by the anaerobic digester was sufficient and it became evident from our operation that the loading rate to the duckweed was the limiting factor of the system.  The overall removal of COD through the entire system was from an average of 3713 +/- 6322 mg/l in the influent to 372 
+/- 81 mg/l in the effluent.  The N concentration declined from 350 +/- 70 mg/l to 94.5 +/- 34 mg/l.  The P concentration was reduced from 144 +/- 38 mg/l to 35 +/- 13 mg/l.  These levels would be lower if there was less of a loading rate and the system was allowed to stabilize. 

Obj. 2, Task 3 – Stabilizing or Recovery of Solids

BEST Solids-Liquid Separation Systems and Solids Combustion (Westerman)
    The solids/liquid separation portion of the BEST system consists of two solids separation systems placed in series for flushed swine manure.  One system has a screw-press separator (FAN) followed by tangential flow gravity-settling tanks (TFS system), and the other system has a screen and hydraulic press separator (Filtramat) followed by TFS system.  The objective of this project is to separate and collect swine manure solids with dry solids content of more than 30 %.  The FAN/TFS system and the Filtramat/TFS system were operational by May 1, 2003.  Approximately 36,000 kg (79,000 lb.) of wet solids (about 68 % moisture) were collected in large bags during May through July 2003, and trucked to EPI in Idaho for combustion testing.  Combustion testing began on August 1, 2003. Initial combustion tests indicated that a 3:1mixture of turkey litter and separated swine solids combusted adequately producing a good ash product.   The resulting ash was sent to a test facility in Alabama to incorporate into fertilizer blends.

Belt System (van Kempen)
    A belt-based housing system was evaluated for approximately 100 grow-finish pigs.  Evaluation is completed and results will be reported at ASAE meetings Oct. 2003.   The belt system works well for collecting dry fecal stream (50% DM) and results in a substantial reduction in ammonia emission (6.5% of feed nitrogen).

Objective 3, Task 1 -- Airborne emissions

Sources of Emissions in Swine House (van Kempen)
    A project is in progress to identify the sources of airborne emissions from swine houses.  Trials to date show that animal and/or floor surface is source of phenolics/VFA.  Alkanes are from pit. Ammonia is from floor and pit (50/50), and methane is from animal only. Together with the DIAS (Danish institute of animal science), the source of odor will be more closely examined (slats vs. animal).

b.  Usefulness of findings:

The demonstration and evaluation of alternative swine manure treatment systems will provide information on treatment effectiveness, reliability, and operational requirements.  Other teams of researchers will also provide economics and measurements of odor, pathogens and ammonia emission for the farm-scale projects.  This information will allow more complete evaluation of alternative systems to improve manure management and byproduct utilization, and reduce environmental effects to air and water.  Research on the sources of airborne emissions from swine houses will allow for targeted approaches to reduce these emissions.

c.  Planned work for 2003-2004:

Demonstration and evaluation will continue on alternative manure management systems under the agreements between Smithfield Foods, Inc./Premium Standard Farms and the N. C. Attorney General.  Treatment systems.  Systems include an SBR system, two belt systems, an aerated upflow biofilter system (Ekokan, Inc.), and energy and ash from combusting separated swine solids and turkey litter (BEST, LLC).  For all these systems, technical and economic analyses will be conducted. 

For nutrient utilization, work will continue to develop and evaluate a continuous-flow duckweed system for nutrient removal from swine wastewater after anaerobic digestion.  The goal of future research with this system is to determine the proper feeding rate necessary to create a stable situation that can treat a steady flow of influent.  Future research will also be performed to compare the performance of three different types of duckweed to provide for the best possible system design.

d.  Publications Issued:

Refereed Articles

Arogo, J., P. W. Westerman and A. Heber.  2003.  A review of ammonia emissions from confined swine feeding operations.  Transactions of the ASAE 46(3):805-817.

Arogo, J., P. W. Westerman and Z. S. Liang.  Comparing ammonium ion dissociation constant in swine anaerobic lagoon liquid and deionized water.  Transactions of the ASAE (in press).

Chaiprapat, S., J. Cheng, J. J. Classen, J. J. Ducoste and S. K. Liehr.  2003.  Modeling nitrogen transport in duckweed pond for secondary treatment of swine wastewater.  Journal of Environmental Engineering 129(8):731-739.

Conference Papers and Proceedings

Arogo, J., P. W. Westerman, A. J. Heber, W. P. Robarge and J. J. Classen.  2003.  Ammonia emissions from animal feeding operations.  In: Proceedings of AWRA 2003 Spring Specialty Conference Agricultural Hydrology and Water Quality.  May 12-14, 2003, Kansas City, MO.  AWRA, Middleburg, VA.

Bowers, K. E. and P. W. Westerman.  2003.  Phosphorus removal in a novel fluidized bed crystallizer.  ASAE Annual International Meeting, July 27-30, 2003, Las Vegas, NV. ASAE Paper No. 03-4123. ASAE, St. Joseph, MI.
 
Cheng, J., S. Liehr and C. Lyerly.  2003.  Swine wastewater treatment in an integrated system of anaerobic digestion and duckweed nutrient removal.  ASAE Annual International Meeting, July 27-30, 2003, Las Vegas, NV.  ASAE, St. Joseph, MI.

Sweeten, J., L. Jacobson, A. Heber, D. Schmidt, J. Lorimor, P. Westerman, J. R. Miner, R. Zhang, C. M. Williams and B. W. Auverman.  2003.  Odor mitigation for concentrated animal feeding operations:  White paper and recommendations. In: Proceedings of AWRA 2003 Spring Specialty Conference Agricultural Hydrology and Water Quality.  May 12-14, 2003, Kansas City, MO.  AWRA, Middleburg, VA.

Westerman, P. W., J. Arogo, A. Kantardjieff and P. Kantardjieff.  2003.  Evaluation of Ekokan biofiltration treatment system on a swine farm.  ASAE Annual International Meeting, July 27-30, 2003, Las Vegas, NV.  ASAE Paper No. 03-4125. ASAE, St. Joseph, MI.

Westerman, P. W. and J. Arogo.  2003.  Performance of the IESS biokinetic air waste treatment system on a swine farm.  In:  Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Animal, Agricultural and Food Processing Waste,  October 12-15, 2003. Research Triangle Park, NC.  ASAE, St. Joseph, MI.

Westerman, P. W., J. Arogo, G. Boyd and K. Elmer.  2003  Evaluation of the “BEST” system – solids/liquid separation and solids combustion.  In: Proceedings of the NCSU Animal Waste Management Conference, October 16-17, 2003, Research Triangle Park, NC. N. C. State University, Raleigh, NC.


HOME   |   2003 Station Reports