Using Plant Growth Retardants to Produce Coreopsis verticillata ‘Moonbeam’ as a Greenhouse Pot Crop

 J. Raymond Kessler, Jr. and Gary J. Keever

Coreopsis verticillata ‘Moonbeam’ is a herbaceous perennial, which blooms in late spring to early summer. It has no vernalization requirement, but an obligate requirement for long photoperiods (>14 hours or night-break lighting) to flower. Because vegetative growth and flowering can be controlled using photoperiod, it may be possible to develop the plant as a greenhouse pot crop. However, Coreopsis may grow too tall in small containers under greenhouse conditions for market acceptance, and therefore may benefit from plant growth retardants. This study was conducted to determine the plant growth retardant type, application method, and rate required to produce a marketable greenhouse pot plant of Coreopsis verticillata ‘Moonbeam’ in 4-inch pots.

METHODS
Terminal cuttings (2.5 inches long) of Coreopsis verticillata ‘Moonbeam’ were removed from vegetative plants and stuck in 72-celled flats containing Fafard Germinating Mix. Cuttings were rooted using intermittent mist in a shaded glass greenhouse under natural short photoperiods with 85oF bottom heat. Rooted cuttings were removed from mist after 27 days and placed in an unshaded glass greenhouse with a heat set point temperature of 65oF and ventilation at 78oF. All cuttings received a soft terminal pinch 2 days after removal from propagation. Cuttings were transplanted to 4-inch square pots containing Sunshine Mix 1 19 days after pinching, and initially placed pot-to-pot on a greenhouse bench. Fertilization throughout the experiment was applied as a constant liquid feed consisting of 150 ppm nitrogen using a 20-10-20 with one clear water application per week to prevent soluble salts buildup. Plants were watered/fertilized when the medium appeared dry, but before plants wilted. All cuttings were sheared to 2.5 inches above the pot rim 13 days after transplanting.

Plant growth retardant treatments were applied 10 days after shearing. Long photoperiods were started the same day by lighting plants from 10:00 p.m. to 2:00 a.m. using a minimum of 10 foot-candles from incandescent lamps (60 watt). Growth retardant treatments consisted of A-Rest drench at 0, 0.125, 0.25, or 0.375 mg a.i./pot; Bonzi drench at 0, 0.125, 0.25, or 0.375 mg a.i./pot; B-Nine spray at 0, 2,550, 5,100, or 7,650 ppm; Bonzi spray at 0, 12, 24, 36, 48, or 60 ppm; Cutless spray at 0, 25, 50, 75, 100, 150, or 200 ppm; or Royal Slo-Gro spray at 0, 360, 720, 1,080, 1,440, or 1,800 ppm. Foliar spray solutions were applied at a rate of 0.5 gallon per 100 square feet using a pressurized CO2 sprayer calibrated at 20 psi. Soil drench solutions were applied at 2 fluid ounces per pot. After treatment, plants were spaced on 8-inch centers. Data recorded at the time of first open flower was flower date, shoot height, growth index [(height + width1 + width2)/3 where width1 is at the widest point, and width2 is perpendicular to width1], market quality rating (1=very poor, unsalable; 2=poor, unsalable; 3=average, salable; 4=good, salable; 5=excellent, salable), and length of the five longest lateral shoots.

RESULTS
All growth retardants resulted in decreased shoot height, growth index, and lateral shoot length with increasing concentration except for Bonzi and Royal Slo-Gro sprays (see table). The highest rate of A-Rest and Bonzi drench, B-Nine, and Cutless decreased shoot height compared to untreated plants by 36%, 30%, 21%, and 36%, respectively. Bonzi spray did not affect shoot height, growth index, or lateral shoot length while the highest rate of Royal Slo-Gro increased shoot height by 30% and lateral shoot length by 19% compared to untreated plants, but had no effect on growth index. A market quality rating of 4.0 or higher (good, salable) was given to plants treated with B-Nine at 5,100 or 7,650 ppm or Cutless at 150 or 200 ppm. Plants given a Bonzi drench received poor market quality ratings despite plant size reductions similar to those treatments receiving average or good ratings because of distorted lateral shoots with an unacceptable increase in branch angle. The highest rate of B-Nine and Royal Slo-Gro delayed flowering by an average of 5 and 16 days, respectively, compared to untreated plants. The increase in shoot height and lateral shoot length with increasing concentration of Royal Slo-Gro was possibly due to delayed flowering resulting in more time for vegetative growth.

Response of Coreopsis verticillata ‘Moonbeam’ to Drench Application of A-Rest or Bonzi or Spray Application of B-Nine, Bonzi, Cutless, or Royal Slo-Gro
Growth
retardant

Rate
Shoot
height (cm)1
Growth index2 Lateral shoot length (cm)1 Quality rating3 Days to flower
  Drench (mg a.i. per pot)
A-Rest 0 35.1 43.7 34.3 2.0 33
  0.125 27.8 71.6 27.9 2.0 33
  0.250 26.1 37.1 23.5 2.6 32
  0.375 22.4 31.0 19.7 3.1 33
Bonzi 0 34.4 48.1 34.4 2.0 33
  0.125 27.6 45.3 31.1 2.0 33
  0.250 24.9 40.4 29.4 2.0 33
  0.375 24.0 38.9 26.9 2.0 33
  Spray (ppm)
B-Nine 0 32.7 43.7 30.5 2.0 34
  2550 28.2 33.6 23.3 3.4 37
  5100 25.9 29.4 20.6 4.1 37
  7650 25.9 29.0 20.4 4.1 40
Bonzi 0 33.0 46.1 33.1 2.0 33
  12 33.9 45.0 30.6 2.0 31
  24 33.6 45.7 30.3 2.0 32
  36 33.8 47.0 32.3 1.9 32
  48 30.7 45.7 32.3 2.0 33
  60 30.4 43.7 31.1 2.0 32
Cutless 0 33.9 48.0 33.4 2.0 33
  25 30.7 41.5 30.0 2.1 33
  50 27.9 38.1 24.1 2.3 32
  75 25.9 32.1 20.8 3.0 32
  100 23.8 31.5 20.6 3.4 32
  150 23.3 31.7 20.5 4.0 32
  200 21.7 29.7 16.8 4.1 32
Royal Slo-Gro 0 33.7 46.8 34.0 2.0 32
  360 39.2 44.0 34.3 2.0 42
  720 40.1 43.7 37.1 2.0 45
  1080 42.3 45.6 39.6 2.0 45
  1440 42.2 44.2 39.2 2.0 47
  1800 43.7 44.0 40.4 2.0 48
 1 English conversion 2.54 cm = 1 inch.
2 Growth index = (height + width1 + width2)/3 in centimeters. Width1 is at the widest point, and width2 is perpendicular to width1.
3 Quality rating: 1=very poor, unsalable; 2=poor, unsalable; 3=average, salable; 4=good, salable; 5=excellent, salable.

When applied as a foliar spray, both B-Nine and Cutless resulted in acceptable market quality plants of Coreopsis verticillata ‘Moonbeam’ when grown in 4-inch pots in the greenhouse. However, Cutless is not currently labeled for application to ornamentals. B-Nine was equally effective when applied at 5,100 or 7,650 ppm. However, the former concentration may be a better choice because it resulted in less flower delay (3 days compared to 5 days).



Top of page

Previous

Contents

Next