|
Stephanie E. Burnett, Gary J.
Keever, J. Raymond Kessler, and Charles H. Gilliam
Coreopsis
rosea, or pink coreopsis, is a delicate,
erect, finely branched herbaceous perennial, growing 12-18 inches
tall, and producing 0.75-inch pink flowers. Characterized by
rapid growth, pink coreopsis is often difficult to manage during
production, requiring time-consuming pruning for size control.
Various plant growth retardants (PGRs), including B-Nine, Cutless,
and Sumagic, have been used to control excessive growth in horticultural
crops including the closely related species Coreopsis verticillata
Moonbeam and Coreopsis grandiflora. However,
no previous work has been published using PGRs on Coreopsis
rosea. The objective of this study was to determine the effectiveness
of B-Nine, Cutless, and Sumagic in controlling growth of pink
coreopsis.
METHODS
Rooted cuttings of pink coreopsis were transplanted to 4-inch
square pots containing Fafard #3 growing medium, and placed pot-to-pot.
Before treatments were applied, plants were sheared to 2.5 inches
above the pot rim, spaced on 8-inch centers, and provided night-break
lighting from 10:00 p.m. to 2:00 a.m. to simulate long days.
Growth retardants were applied at 0, 2,500, 5,000, or 7,500 parts
per million (ppm) for B-Nine; 25, 50, 75, 100, 125, or 150 ppm
for Cutless; and 10, 20, 30, or 40 ppm for Sumagic. Date of the
first open flower, shoot height, and growth index [(height +
width1 + width2)/3, where width1 is widest point and width2 is
perpendicular to width1] were collected at that time. Each plant
was rated for market quality on a scale of 1-4 (1 = poor, unmarketable;
2 = fair, acceptable; 3 = highly marketable; 4 = excellent) when
one-third of the flowers were open, with a quality of 2.5 or
higher considered marketable.
RESULTS
Time to first flower was not significantly increased by any PGR,
but was decreased by approximately 3 days for Cutless and Sumagic
as compared to untreated controls (see table). At first flower,
increasing rates of all PGRs reduced shoot height. Shoot heights
at first flower of plants treated with the lowest and highest
rates of each PGR were reduced 18 and 25% for B-Nine, 11 and
27% for Cutless, and 20 and 29% for Sumagic, respectively, relative
to height of controls. Growth indeces followed trends similar
to height.
|
Effects of Foliar Application
of Plant Growth Regulators on Coreopsis rosea American
Dream |
|
Growth retardant |
Rate (ppm) |
Height at first flower
(cm) |
Days to full flower1 |
Quality rating2 |
|
Control3 |
0 |
37 |
46 |
1.4 |
|
B-Nine |
2500 |
30 |
50 |
2.7 |
|
|
5000 |
31 |
47 |
2.6 |
|
|
7500 |
28 |
47 |
2.8 |
|
Cutless |
25 |
33 |
44 |
2.0 |
|
|
50 |
32 |
42 |
2.1 |
|
|
75 |
27 |
42 |
2.8 |
|
|
100 |
31 |
45 |
2.6 |
|
|
125 |
28 |
43 |
3.0 |
|
|
150 |
27 |
44 |
3.0 |
|
Sumagic |
10 |
30 |
45 |
2.3 |
|
|
20 |
28 |
41 |
3.1 |
|
|
30 |
27 |
42 |
3.1 |
|
|
40 |
26 |
42 |
3.3 |
1When one-third
of flowers were fully opened.
2Quality rating: 1 = poor, unmarketable; 2 = fair,
acceptable; 3 = highly marketable; 4 = excellent.
3Water application. |
Time to one-third flowers had opened (full
flower) decreased by as much as 4 days with Cutless at rates
of 75 ppm and increased slightly with higher rates. Time to full
flower decreased as much as 5 days with Sumagic, while B-Nine
had no effect on this measurement compared to controls.
Market quality rating of plants treated with B-Nine, Cutless,
or Sumagic increased with increasing rate. Highest numerical
values for market quality were obtained with B-Nine at 7,500
ppm, Cutless at 125 or 150 ppm, and Sumagic at 40 ppm. Control
plants were considered unmarketable based on the ratio of height
to pot size, while those treated with all PGR-rate combinations
were considered marketable.
The growth retardants, B-Nine at 2,500-7,500 ppm, Cutless at
25-150 ppm, and Sumagic at 10-40 ppm, appear useful in the production
of a superior pink coreopsis crop. These PGRs reduced plant size
and enhanced plant quality without delaying flowering. In addition
to improved quality, the compact size of treated plants should
facilitate shipping and handling. |