|
Austin Hagan, J. Randy Akridge,
and Ken Tilt
Few flowering shrubs can match the beauty, versatility,
and popularity of roses. In recent years, interest of rose fanciers
and landscape designers has expanded to include hybrid tea, Florabunda,
and Grandaflora roses but also newly released cultivars of shrub
and ground cover roses. Typically, diseases, particularly black
spot, have a detrimental impact on the aesthetics and health
of the vast majority of rose cultivars. Alabamas often
wet and warm climate along with a long growing season, which
favors the rapid development and spread of disease, mandates
the adoption of an intensive, season-long fungicide spray program
to maintain the health and beauty of most cultivated roses. Although
the susceptibility of most hybrid tea, Florabunda, and Grandiflora
roses is well known, the reaction of newly released shrub and
ground cover roses to diseases is largely unknown. Also, little
or no information is available concerning their adaptability
to Alabamas hot summers.
Results of an AAES study started in the spring of 1998 indicate
that selected cultivars of ground cover and shrub roses in a
simulated landscape planting significantly differ in their susceptibility
to black spot and Cercospora leaf spot. Although many of the
cultivars tested proved highly susceptible to black spot, a few
suffered only light to moderate damage and may be good choices
in low maintenance landscapes.
METHODS
Bare-root roses were potted in a pine
bark/peat moss (3:1 by volume) medium amended with 14 pounds
of 17-7-12 Osmocote, 6 pounds of dolomitic limestone, 2 pounds
of gypsum, and 1.5 pounds of Micromax per cubic yard. One month
later, the potted roses were transplanted into raised beds at
the Brewton Experiment Field where the fertility and pH had been
adjusted according to the results of a soil assay. The beds were
mulched with aged pine bark and a drip irrigation system was
installed. During the growing season, the roses were watered
as needed.
A tank mixture of 1 pound of Gallery 75DF and 2 quarts of Surflan
T/O per acre was broadcast over the beds for preemergence weed
control. Hand weeding and directed applications of recommended
rates of Roundup or MSMA were used to control escaped weeds.
Ammonium nitrate at the rate of 40 pounds per treated acre was
broadcast monthly during the growing season over the beds. The
severity of black spot and Cercospora leaf spot was rated on
a scale of 1 to 10 on April 25, June 3, August 5, October 16,
and December 3, 1998. The rating scale is described in the footnote
to the table.
|
Reaction of Cultivars of Ground Cover and Shrub
Roses to Black ASpot and Cercospora Leaf Spot, Dec. 3, 1998 |
|
Cultivar |
Black spot rating1 |
Cultivar |
Black spot rating1 |
|
Royal Bonica |
6.6 |
The Fairy |
5.02 |
|
Betty Prior |
6.6 |
Fushia Meidiland |
4.8 |
|
Sevillana |
6.4 |
Nozomi |
4.4 |
|
First Light |
6.4 |
White Flower Carpet |
4.2 |
|
Carefree Delight |
6.2 |
Red Cascade |
3.8 |
|
Bonica |
6.1 |
Rosa mutabulis |
3.8 |
|
Cherry Meidiland |
6.0 |
Rosa wichuraina |
3.6 |
|
Nearly Wild |
5.8 |
Happy Trails |
3.4 |
|
Jeepers Creepers |
5.6 |
Magic Carpet |
3.0 |
|
Peach Meidiland |
5.6 |
Ralphs Creeper |
3.0 |
|
Sea Foam |
5.2 |
Flower Carpet |
2.6 |
|
Mystic Meidiland |
5.2 |
Petite Pink Scotch |
1.0 |
|
Livin Easy |
5.2 |
|
|
1Black spot and Cercospora
leaf spot were rated on a 1 to 10 scale, where 1 = no disease,
2 = very few spots in lower canopy, 3 = a few spots in lower
and upper canopy, 4 = some spots with light defoliation in lower
canopy, 5 = spots noticeable with noticeable defoliation, 6 =
spots numerous with significant (50+%) defoliation, 7 = spots
numerous with severe defoliation (75+%), 8 = upper canopy badly
diseased with high (90%) defoliation, 9 = very few remaining
leaves covered with spots, and 10 = plant defoliated.
2Disease rating for The Fairy includes
damage attributed to black spot and Cecospora leaf spot. |
RESULTS
In 1998, weather patterns from late April
through much of August were unusually hot and dry. As a result,
the development and spread of black spot and other leaf diseases
during that time was suppressed. In September, an excess of 30
inches of rain was recorded from two tropical storms. The weather,
which remained relatively wet and unseasonably mild from October
into early December, favored the onset and rapid spread of disease.
Although none of the 25 cultivars screened were immune to both
diseases, considerable differences in the severity of black spot
and Cercospora leaf spot were seen (see table). By far, black
spot was the predominate disease observed. Black spot-related
spotting of the foliage and early leaf shed was recorded on all
but one cultivar Petite Pink Scotch, which remained
free of this disease all season. With disease ratings of 2.6
to 3.8 at seasons-end, Flower Carpet, Ralphs
Creeper, Magic Carpet, Happy Trails,
Rosa. wichuraiana, R. mutabulis, and Red
Cascade generally suffered light to moderate spotting of
the leaves in the lower to mid-canopy and possibly some light
defoliation around the base of the plant. Moderate spotting of
the leaves with increasingly heavier leaf shed was recorded for
White Flower Carpet, Nozomi, and Fushia
Meidiland. The heaviest spotting and yellowing of the leaves
and defoliation levels exceeding 50% (as indicated by disease
ratings of 6.0 to 6.6) were noted for Cherry Meidiland,
Bonica, Carefree Delight, First
Light, Sevillana, Betty Prior,
and Royal Bonica. On the remaining cultivars with
disease ratings of 5.0 to 5.8, black spot-related leaf spot and
premature leaf shed was extensive.
Development of Cercospora leaf spot was also noted on two cultivars.
On Petite Pink Scotch (disease rating of 5.6), symptoms
of only Cercospora leaf spot were observed while the The
Fairy (disease rating of 5.0) may have been damaged by
both black spot and Cercospora leaf spot. On both cultivars,
heavy spotting of the leaves in the lower and mid-canopy along
with noticeable defoliation was observed.
Observations concerning the appearance of the foliage and plant
vigor were also recorded during the growing season. Some cultivars
tolerated the hot summer of 1998 while others did not. Magic
Carpet, which demonstrated resistance to black spot in
the December ratings, suffered greatly from the high summer temperatures.
By August, this cultivar had shed nearly all of its leaves and
shoot growth had ceased. Extensive bronzing or yellowing of the
leaves along with some premature defoliation was noted that same
month on White Flower Carpet and Flower Carpet.
Like Magic Carpet, both of these cultivars had partial
to full recovery by early December from summer heat stress. Some
light bronzing or discoloration of the older leaves, particularly
those around the base of the plant, was recorded on the majority
of the remaining cultivars. The foliage of Fushia Meidiland,
which appeared to have suffered from some mineral deficiency,
remained yellow or chlorotic throughout much of the growing season.
Among the cultivars tested, R. mutabulis, R. wichuraiana,
Bonica, Jeepers Creeper, The
Fairy, Ralphs Creeper, Nozomi,
Petite Pink Scotch, Livin Easy,
Nearly Wild, and Mystic Meidiland appeared
to have the best heat tolerance.
In summary, significant differences in the disease severity and
general adaptability were noted among the 25 cultivars of ground
cover and shrub roses. Those cultivars with the best resistance
to disease and heat stress were Ralphs Creeper,
Happy Trails, R. mutabulis, and R.
wichuraina; all would be excellent choices in a low maintenance
landscape. Although some light bronzing of the inner canopy was
seen on Red Cascade, this cultivar also demonstrated
disease resistance. The heat sensitive cultivars Flower
Carpet, White Flower Carpet, and Magic
Carpet which appeared unsightly and unthrifty throughout
much of the growing season, would be poor choices for landscape
plantings across much of Alabama. To maintain plant health and
beauty of the remaining roses, an intensive, season-long fungicide
spray program would be required to keep black spot or Cercospora
leaf spot in check.
|