|
Tony Grift
To ensure that granular fertilizer
is evenly distributed in their fields, farmers must calibrate
their spreaders to determine fertilizer output and spread pattern.
But the standard method of calibration is a tedious process.
It involves placing 25 collection trays in a row, spreading fertilizer
in the trays, weighing the trays contents, and computing
the overlapped uniformity and application rate at a certain swath
width.
Now, theres good
news on the calibration front. After years of intensive research,
AAES researchers in the Department of Biosystems Engineering
at Auburn University have developed a system that automates the
process. Instead of collecting fertilizer, this system predicts
where individual fertilizer particles will land. Using a special
built-in optical sensor, the device measures the velocity and
diameter of a sampling of fertilizer granules and uses a mathematical
ballistic model to predict where the granules will end up on
the ground.
This model takes into account
the air density, the temperature, and the mass of each fertilizer
particle. Accumulation of several thousand landing spots reveals
the shape of the spread pattern. Using this pattern, a custom
computer program calculates a simulated overlapped pattern that
would emerge on the ground at a preset swath width.
Figure 1. Optical measurement device. |
The newly developed electronic
calibration sensor (Figure 1) works like this: Fertilizer particles
that are thrown from the disc pass through the square hole in
the back plate. As they pass the sensor, they interrupt a double
light beam, one in the front and one in the back. The time between
the two interruption processes is measured and used to compute
the velocity of the particles. In addition, the amount of time
a particle blocks either sensor is measured. Combined, these
two measurements yield the diameter of the particle. |
|
Field
tests of the optical calibration sensor were conducted using
a Lowery 300 broadcast spreader (Figure 2) with the hopper half
filled. As the spreader worked, the measurement device rotated
around the spreader rim to sample the entire spreading zone.
A separate encoder measured the angle of the sensor with respect
to the spreader. |
Figure 2. Field testing of calibration instrument.
 |
|
All
signals were fed into a computer that stored the data. These
data were then used as input for the computer model that predicted
the landing positions of the particles. |
Figure 3. Landing spots of approximately
1,000 fertilizer
particles
 |
Results of the field
test (Figure 3) show that the spread pattern is skewed and that
there is a gap at 90 degrees. That occurred because this kind
of spreader has two feed holes that can be adjusted separately.
Using this information, the operator could compensate for the
gap by changing the swath width or by adjusting the setting for
the right or left feed holes. |
Ultimately, the new
calibration device will lead to significant improvements in fertilizer
distribution in a field. The principle, however, can readily
be upgraded to larger fertilizer application equipment. The device
also can be used as a basis to measure mass flows of particles,
which is of interest in aerial fertilizer application. In addition,
the information from the sensor can also be tied in with spatial
information from Global Positioning System (GPS) receivers to
build site-specific fertilizer application equipment (smart
spreader systems). The system as developed here can help
to make precision agriculture an everyday reality.
Grift is Assistant Professor
in Biosystems Engineering. |