 |
 |
| Bulletins,
Circulars, Progress Reports |
|
Bulletin 644
February 2002
Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station
John Jensen,
Interim Director
Auburn University
Auburn, Alabama
|
RESISTANCE OF SELECTED CRAPEMYRTLE CULTIVARS TO POWDERY
MILDEW AND CERCOSPORA LEAF SPOT
Austin K. Hagan, Gary J. Keever, Charles H.
Gilliam,
J. David Williams, and Greg Creech
Hagan is Professor of Entomology and Plant Pathology; Keever,
Gilliam, and Williams are Professors of Horticulture, Creech is
Research Associate of Horticulture; all at Auburn University.
|
|
|
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
Photo gallery of crapemyrtle cultivars
|
|
INTRODUCTION
|
Brilliant fall color,
handsome exfoliating bark, lush foliage, and large showy flower panicles
have made crapemyrtle (Lagerstroemia indica) a fixture in landscapes
and gardens across Alabama (17). Introduced from China in 1747, crapemyrtles
range in size from small shrubs to sizable trees and are widely used in
screens, hedges, mass plantings, or as accent or specimen plants. This highly
versatile shrub and tree, which blooms throughout much of the summer, is
best adapted to well-drained soils on sunny sites in USDA Hardiness Zones
7 to 9 (4,16). In the mid-1950s, Lagerstroemia fauriei was introduced
from Japan and was later hybridized with L. indica to produce a number
of highly desirable selections of crapemyrtle. In addition, a number of
improved cultivars of crapemyrtle (L. indica) have also been released
into the nursery market.
Powdery mildew (Erysiphe lagerstroemia)
is the most widely recognized and common disease on crapemyrtle (1). Although
this disease is not a serious threat to the health of established plants,
a severe outbreak of powdery mildew can greatly detract from the beauty
of crapemyrtle in landscape plantings. Powdery mildew, which usually appears
in late spring or early summer, is easily recognized by the appearance of
white to buff-colored colonies of E. lagerstroemia on leaves, tender
shoots, and bud scales on the blooms. On heavily mildewed crapemyrtle, twisting
of the leaves, flower bud abortion, and shoot dieback may also be seen (1).
Cercospora leaf spot (Cercospora
lythracearum), which is not as well known as powdery mildew, may actually
be more common than the latter disease (2). Circular to irregular brown
spots, which first appear on mature leaves in late June to early July, are
not noticeable until August. As the spots enlarge, the leaves turn yellow
to bright red and quickly fall to the ground. Typically, leaf spotting and
defoliation start on the lower limbs and gradually spread upward through
the plant canopy until all but the youngest leaves at the shoot tips are
lost. The heavy leaf shed associated with damaging disease outbreaks can
greatly detract from the brilliant fall color display of leaf spot-susceptible
crapemyrtle.
Disease resistance is an effective,
inexpensive, and pesticide-free method of producing and maintaining plantings
of crapemyrtle in the nursery and landscape. As indicated above, a number
of improved cultivars in the three crapemyrtle taxa (L. indica, L. fauriei,
and L. indica x fauriei) were selected for superior horticultural
characteristics as well as tolerance or resistance to powdery mildew (5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14).
In recent studies, Knox et al. (16) and Windham et al. (18)
did not see significant colonization of the leaves of hybrid crapemyrtle
cultivars by the powdery mildew fungus. In Louisiana, Holcomb (15) noted
that several of the hybrid selections (L. indica x fauriei)
and a number of cultivars of crapemyrtle (L. indica) were susceptible
to powdery mildew and Cercospora leaf spot. In the same study, the hybrid
cultivars Tonto, Tuscarora, and Catawba
were resistant to both powdery mildew and Cercospora leaf spot (15).
In a landscape planting in Auburn, Alabama,
selections in three crapemyrtle taxa (L. indica, L. fauriei, and
L. indica x fauriei) were screened for their susceptibility to
powdery mildew and Cercospora leaf spot. |
| MATERIALS
AND METHODS |
A field planting
of 45 selections of crapemyrtle in the taxa L. indica, L. fauriei,
and L. indica x fauriei was established on the Alabama Agricultural
Experiment Station (AAES) unit on the campus of Auburn University, Alabama
(USDA Hardiness Zone 8a). Before planting, soil fertility and pH were adjusted
according to the recommendations of a soil fertility assay of the Auburn
University Soil Testing Laboratory. In March 1993, bare-root liners were
planted in full sun in a Marvyn loamy sand on eight-foot centers in rows
spaced 12 feet apart. The test site was sloped slightly to the southeast.
The experimental design was a randomized complete block with six, two-tree
replications. A trickle irrigation system with two emitters per tree was
installed at the time of tree establishment, and the trees were watered
as needed. Twice each spring, approximately six ounces of 13-13-13 analysis
fertilizer was uniformly distributed around the base of each plant. A tank-mix
of Princep 4L and Surflan A.S. pre-emergent herbicides was applied at label
rates in March 1996 and March 1997. Hand weeding and directed applications
of label rates of Roundup Pro herbicide were used to control escape weeds.
Alleys between the rows were periodically mowed. In 1995, all trees were
mulched with two inches of aged pine bark. During the winters of 1995 and
1996, each tree was lightly pruned to enhance form and structure.
Within two years of planting, the causal
fungi of powdery mildew (E. lagerstroemia) and Cercospora leaf spot
(C. lythracearum) were well established in this planting of crapemyrtle.
Powdery mildew ratings were recorded on July 28, 1995; June 4, 1996; and
June 25, 1997 using a scale of 0 to 4 (0 = no disease, 1 = 1 to 25%, 2 =
26 to 50%, 3 = 51 to 75%, and 4 = 76 to 100% of the leaves, shoots, and
buds damaged or colonized by E. lagerstroemia). The severity of Cercospora
leaf spot was evaluated on September 15, 1995; September 4, 1996; and August
29, 1997 using the Barratt and Horsfall Rating System (1 = 0%, 2 = 0 to
3%, 3 = 3 to 6%, 4 = 6 to 12%, 5 = 12 to 25%, 6 = 25 to 50%, 7 = 50 to 75%,
8 = 75 to 87%, 9 = 87 to 94%, 10 = 94 to 97%, 11 = 97 to 100%, and 12 =
100% of the leaves exhibiting characteristic symptoms or prematurely lost
due to this disease). |
| RESULTS |
By mid-May
each year, the typical fluffy white colonies of the powdery mildew fungus
were seen on the young leaves and shoots of the mildew-susceptible crapemyrtle
cultivars. Generally, the occurrence of powdery mildew peaked between
mid-June and late July. The fungal colonies persisted on leaves of susceptible
cultivars until early fall. Although symptoms of Cercospora leaf spot
first appeared on highly susceptible cultivars as early as June, spotting
of the leaves and premature leaf shed usually were not noticeable on most
cultivars until mid-August to early September. Spotting of the leaves
and leaf shed continued through the fall until the first hard frost in
late October or early November.
As a group,
the cultivars of crapemyrtle (L. indica) were more susceptible
to powdery mildew than were the hybrid crapemyrtles (L. indica
x fauriei) and L. fauriei Fantasy (Tables
1 and 2). Powdery mildew ratings for all
of the hybrid crapemyrtle cultivars and L. fauriei Fantasy
were similar in all three years. In 1995 and 1996, the severity of Cercospora
leaf spot averaged across all cultivars of L. indica and L.
indica x fauriei did not differ. Cercospora leaf spot damage
levels for L. fauriei Fantasy were lower than the averaged
ratings for the other two crapemyrtle taxa.
Considerable
differences in the incidence of powdery mildew were seen among the 20
cultivars of L. indica (Table 1). Also,
disease incidence differed considerably from year to year on many of these
cultivars, especially on those highly susceptible to powdery mildew. In
two of three years, heavy colonization of the leaves and shoots, as indicated
by disease ratings of 2.0 or above, was seen on County Red
crapemyrtle (Table 2). High levels of disease
also were seen in one of three years on Carolina Beauty, Raspberry
Sundae, Wonderful White, Grays Red,
Orbin Adkins, and Seminole. Noticeable mildewing
of the leaves and shoots, which was indicated by disease ratings between
1.0 and 2.0, was seen in at least one year on an additional 11 selections
of L. indica crapemyrtle. Cherokee remained mildew-free,
while low levels of powdery mildew were seen each year on Glendora
White.
In at least
one year, considerable Cercospora leaf spot-related spotting of the leaves
and early leaf shed were observed on nearly all cultivars of L. indica
(Table 2). By early fall, Orbin
Adkins and Wonderful White consistently suffered severe
defoliation and heavy spotting of the few remaining leaves found near
the shoot tips. As indicated by disease ratings above 5.0 in at least
two years, Raspberry Sundae, Powhatan, Majestic
Beauty, Hardy Lavendar, and Carolina Beauty
also proved highly susceptible to Cercospora leaf spot. In contrast, leaf
spotting and early leaf shed, though noticeable, were limited to the lower
quarter of the canopy of Glendora White, Grays
Red, and Velmas Royal Delight.
As expected,
the occurrence of powdery mildew on many of the hybrid (L. indica
x fauriei) crapemyrtle was generally very low (Table
2). Light to moderate outbreaks of this disease, as indicated by disease
ratings between 0.5 and 1.0, were recorded in two years for Zumi
and in one year for Hopi and Pecos. Of all the
cultivars of hybrid crapemyrtle, only Caddo remained free
of powdery mildew in all three years. In two of three years, the characteristic
white colonies of the fungus E. lagerstroemia were not seen on
the leaves, flower buds, or shoots of Sarahs Favorite,
Comanche, Osage, Acoma, Tonto,
Souix, Lipan, or Natchez. On the remaining
hybrid crapemyrtle cultivars, as well as on L. fauriei Fantasy,
the incidence of powdery mildew was limited to a single or a few widely
scattered colonies of the fungus on the leaves, tender shoots, and flower
buds.
Although
most hybrid crapemyrtle selections are highly resistant to powdery mildew,
only a handful were resistant to Cercospora leaf spot (Table
2). Of the 22 selections of hybrid crapemyrtle, Tonto,
Tuskegee, and Tuscarora have the highest level
of resistance to this disease. In each area,damage on these cultivars
and L fauriei Fantasy was confined to light, inconspicuous
spotting of the leaves around the base of the plants. Light to moderate
spotting of the leaves along with a low level of early leaf shed, as indicated
by disease ratings of 2.5 to 3.8, was seen on Bashams Party
Pink, Apalachee, and Wichita. Conversely,
the heaviest spotting of the leaves and premature defoliation were noted
in at least two of three years on Acoma and Comanche.
Cercospora leaf spot ratings of 5.0 or higher were recorded in at least
one year for another five cultivars of hybrid crapemyrtle.
|
| DISCUSSION |
Resistance
to powdery mildew was one of the major selection criteria used to identify
clones of hybrid crapemyrtle for release as part of the U.S. National
Arboretum breeding program (5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14). Beginning
with Natchez and Muskogee, a total of 22 hybrid
cultivars have been released (7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14 ). Resistance of the
cultivars of hybrid crapemyrtle and L. fauriei Fantasy
to powdery mildew is far superior to that shown by the selections of L.
indica. With the exception of Zuni, Pecos,
and Hopi, the cultivars of hybrid crapemyrtle proved highly
resistant or immune to powdery mildew. Typically, similar results have
been obtained when the releases from the U.S. National Arboretum were
evaluated in the field (15,16,18).
Many cultivars
of crapemyrtle (L. indica) were moderately or highly susceptible
to powdery mildew, while others like Glendora White, and Cherokee
were highly resistant to nearly immune to this disease. Of the five mildew
tolerant cultivars of L. indica released by the U.S. National Arboretum,
light to moderate mildew development was recorded in at least one year
on Powhatan, Seminole, Potomac, and
Catawba. As observed in previous trials, Wonderful White
(18), Carolina Beauty (16), and Seminole (16)
were highly susceptible to powdery mildew.
Far more
cultivars of hybrid crapemyrtle were resistant to powdery mildew than
to Cercospora leaf spot. In Louisiana, Holcomb (15) also noted similar
differences in the sensitivity of cultivars of hybrid crapemyrtle to Cercospora
leaf spot. In both the AAES and Louisiana studies, Tonto,
Tuskegee, and Tuscarora were the most Cercospora
leaf spot and powdery mildew resistant. A few cultivars of L. indica
along with L. fauriei Fantasy also suffered relatively
light damage from Cercospora leaf spot and powdery mildew.
Surprisingly,
compared to powdery mildew, Cercospora leaf spot proved to be an equally
if not more, damaging disease on two of the three crapemyrtle taxa. Previously,
powdery mildew garnered far more attention from professionals than did
Cercospora leaf spot. Cultivars resistant to powdery mildew were found
in all three taxa of crapemyrtle. Among the cultivars of L. indica,
Glendora White and Cherokee were among the most
disease resistant. Hybrid crapemyrtle cultivars highly resistant to powdery
mildew were Tonto, Tuskegee, Tuscarora,
Bashams Party Pink, Apalachee, and Caddo.
The one
cultivar of L. fauriei, Fantasy, also suffered little
damage from either disease. When horticultural characteristics and disease
resistance were both considered, the superior white-flowered cultivars
were Natchez, Sarahs Favorite, and Fantasy,
while Bashams Party Pink, Tuscarora, and
Tuskegee were the top rated pink-flowered crapemyrtles (3).
All of the above crapemyrtles can be easily produced in a nursery or maintained
in a landscape without protective fungicide treatments. Those cultivars
that were badly damaged by either powdery mildew, Cercospora leaf spot,
or in some cases both diseases, may not suffer serious damage in the nursery
but would be poor choices for commercial and residential landscapes across
Alabama.
|
| REFERENCES |
1. Alfieri, S. A. 1969. Powdery mildew of crapemyrtle. Fla. Dept. of
Agric. Cons. Ser. Plant Path. Cir. 83. 2 pp.
2. Alfieri, S. A. 1976. Cercospora leaf spot of crapemyrtle, Lagerstroemia
indica. Fla. Dept. of Agric. Cons. Ser. Plant Path Cir. 171. 2 pp.
3. Creech, G., C. Gilliam, G. Keever, A. Hagan, J. Graverman, R. Brantley,
and D. Williams. 1999. Crapemyrtle cultivar performance in Alabama. Proc.
Southern Nursery Assoc. Res. Conf. 44:489-491.
4. Dirr, M.A. 1998. Manual of Woody Landscape Plants: Their identification,
ornamental characteristics, culture, propagation, and uses, 5th Edition.
Stipes Publishing Co. Champaign, IL. 1187 pp.
5. Egolf, D. R. 1967. Four new Lagerstroemia indica cultivars
(Lythraceae). Baileya 15:7-13.
6. Egolf, D. R. 1970. Cherokee and Seminole
two new cultivars of Lagerstroemia indica (Lythraceae). Baileya
17:1-5.
7. Egolf, D. R. 1981. Muskogee and Natchez
Lagerstroemia. HortScience 16:576-577.
8. Egolf, D. R. 1981. Tuscarora Lagerstroemia. HortScience
16:788-789.
9. Egolf, D. R. 1986. Tuskegee Lagerstroemia. HortScience
21:1078-1080.
10. Egolf, D. R. 1986. Acoma, Hopi, Pecos,
and Zumi Lagerstroemia. HortScience 21:1250-1252.
11. Egolf, D. R. 1987. Biloxi, Miami and Wichita
Lagerstroemia. HortScience 22:33-338.
12. Egolf, D. R. 1987. Apalachee, Comanche, Lipan,
Osage, Souix, and Yuma Lagerstroemia.
HortScience 22:674-677.
13. Egolf, D. R. 1990. Caddo and Tonto Lagerstroemia.
HortScience 25:585-587.
14. Egolf, D. R. 1990. Choctaw Lagerstroemia. HortScience
25:992-993.
15. Holcomb, G. E. 1997. Reaction of crapemyrtle cultivars to Cercospora
leaf spot and powdery mildew. Biological and Cultural Tests for Control
of Plant Diseases. 12:56.
16. Knox, G. W., R. F. Mizell, III, and D. O. Chellemi. 1992. Susceptibility
of crapemyrtle cultivars to crapemyrtle aphid and powdery mildew. Proc.
Southern Nursery Assoc. Res. Conf. 37:340-342.
17. Williams, D., K. Tilt, and S. Valenti-Windsor. 1998. Common Crapemyrtle.
Ala. Coop. Ext. Sys. Cir. ANR-1083. 6 pp.
18. Windham, M. T., W. T. Witte, R. J. Sauve, and P. C. Flanagan. 1995.
Powdery mildew observations and growth of crapemyrtle in Tennessee. HortScience
30:813.
|
| |
|